From: Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>,
eric.auger.pro@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
qemu-arm@nongnu.org, peter.maydell@linaro.org, mst@redhat.com,
shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com, imammedo@redhat.com
Cc: marcandre.lureau@redhat.com, drjones@redhat.com,
lersek@redhat.com, ardb@kernel.org, philmd@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 4/6] tests: tpm-emu: Remove assert on TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 19:15:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0f27abdd-ee72-22be-4a3f-d2129561d09b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b310bcc1-02aa-4948-20d0-2e66de68acb3@linux.ibm.com>
Stefan,
On 6/2/20 6:17 PM, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 6/2/20 12:13 PM, Auger Eric wrote:
>> Hi Stefan,
>>
>> On 6/2/20 3:39 PM, Stefan Berger wrote:
>>> On 6/1/20 6:21 AM, Eric Auger wrote:
>>>> While writing tests for checking the content of TPM2 and DSDT
>>>> along with TPM-TIS instantiation I attempted to reuse the
>>>> framework used for TPM-TIS tests. However While dumping the
>>>> ACPI tables I get an assert on TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS. My assumption
>>>> is maybe the other tests did not execute long enough to encounter
>>>> this. So I tentatively propose to remove the assert as it
>>>> does not seem to break other tests and enable the new ones.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> tests/qtest/tpm-emu.c | 1 -
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/tests/qtest/tpm-emu.c b/tests/qtest/tpm-emu.c
>>>> index c43ac4aef8..298d0eec74 100644
>>>> --- a/tests/qtest/tpm-emu.c
>>>> +++ b/tests/qtest/tpm-emu.c
>>>> @@ -49,7 +49,6 @@ static void *tpm_emu_tpm_thread(void *data)
>>>> s->tpm_msg->tag = be16_to_cpu(s->tpm_msg->tag);
>>>> s->tpm_msg->len = be32_to_cpu(s->tpm_msg->len);
>>>> g_assert_cmpint(s->tpm_msg->len, >=, minhlen);
>>>> - g_assert_cmpint(s->tpm_msg->tag, ==, TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS);
>>> You should not have to remove this. The tests are skipped if swtpm does
>>> not support TPM 2 via --tpm2 option. This would be a very old swtpm
>>> version, though. So, all tests are run with --tpm2 option and any
>>> response received from the TPM would be a TPM 2 response that should
>>> have TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS as the tag. I'd be curious what other value you
>>> are seeing there.
>> If I revert this patch I am getting TPM2_ST_SESSIONS on my end.
>
> Is firmware/BIOS active? There's no TPM2_ST_SESSIONS coming out of QEMU.
From what I understand
QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64
tests/qtest/bios-tables-test
launches
x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 \
-qtest unix:/tmp/qtest-20181.sock \
-qtest-log /dev/null -chardev socket,path=/tmp/qtest-20181.qmp,id=char0
-mon chardev=char0,mode=control \
-display none -machine q35,kernel-irqchip=off \
-accel kvm -accel tcg \
-net none -display none \
-chardev socket,id=chr,path=/tmp/qemu-test_acpi_q35_tcg_tpm2.RJJCL0/sock
-tpmdev emulator,id=dev,chardev=chr \
-device tpm-tis,tpmdev=dev \
-drive id=hd0,if=none,file=tests/acpi-test-disk-RAnagW,format=raw
-device ide-hd,drive=hd0 -accel qtest
acpi-test-disk-RAnagW consists in an x86 boot sector code, created by
boot_sector_init (x86_boot_sector)
Thanks
Eric
>
> Stefan
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-02 17:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-01 10:21 [RFC 0/6] TPM-TIS bios-tables-test Eric Auger
2020-06-01 10:21 ` [RFC 1/6] test/tpm-emu: include sockets and channel headers in tpm-emu header Eric Auger
2020-06-02 14:08 ` Stefan Berger
2020-06-01 10:21 ` [RFC 2/6] tests/acpi: Add void tables for Q35/TPM-TIS bios-tables-test Eric Auger
2020-06-02 14:08 ` Stefan Berger
2020-06-05 14:54 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-06-01 10:21 ` [RFC 3/6] tests/acpi: Ignore TPM2.tis and DSDT.tis Eric Auger
2020-06-02 14:09 ` Stefan Berger
2020-06-05 14:55 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-06-01 10:21 ` [RFC 4/6] tests: tpm-emu: Remove assert on TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS Eric Auger
2020-06-02 13:39 ` Stefan Berger
2020-06-02 14:43 ` Stefan Berger
2020-06-02 16:13 ` Auger Eric
2020-06-02 16:17 ` Stefan Berger
2020-06-02 17:15 ` Auger Eric [this message]
2020-06-05 9:35 ` Auger Eric
2020-06-05 15:25 ` Stefan Berger
2020-06-05 15:47 ` Auger Eric
2020-06-08 8:34 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-06-08 9:11 ` Auger Eric
2020-06-01 10:21 ` [RFC 5/6] bios-tables-test: Add Q35/TPM-TIS test Eric Auger
2020-06-02 14:38 ` Stefan Berger
2020-06-05 15:17 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-06-09 12:10 ` Auger Eric
2020-06-01 10:21 ` [RFC 6/6] bios-tables-test: Generate reference tables for Q35/TPM-TIS Eric Auger
2020-06-02 14:39 ` Stefan Berger
2020-06-02 11:42 ` [RFC 0/6] TPM-TIS bios-tables-test Auger Eric
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0f27abdd-ee72-22be-4a3f-d2129561d09b@redhat.com \
--to=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.auger.pro@gmail.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com \
--cc=stefanb@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).