From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
"Cleber Rosa" <crosa@redhat.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"John Snow" <jsnow@redhat.com>,
"Laurent Vivier" <lvivier@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] tests: enable meson test timeouts to improve debuggability
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2023 17:36:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0f4090d2-02cb-ff7e-bdd8-5814607e1711@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZH3tyx//NRnvKY0m@redhat.com>
On 05/06/2023 16.14, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 04:07:46PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 01/06/2023 18.31, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>>> Perhaps the most painful of all the GitLab CI failures we see are
>>> the enforced job timeouts:
>>>
>>> "ERROR: Job failed: execution took longer than 1h15m0s seconds"
>>>
>>> https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/jobs/4387047648
>>>
>>> when that hits the CI log shows what has *already* run, but figuring
>>> out what was currently running (or rather stuck) is an horrendously
>>> difficult.
>>>
>>> The initial meson port disabled the meson test timeouts, in order to
>>> limit the scope for introducing side effects from the port that would
>>> complicate adoption.
>>>
>>> Now that the meson port is basically finished we can take advantage of
>>> more of its improved features. It has the ability to set timeouts for
>>> test programs, defaulting to 30 seconds, but overridable per test. This
>>> is further helped by fact that we changed the iotests integration so
>>> that each iotests was a distinct meson test, instead of having one
>>> single giant (slow) test.
>>>
>>> We already set overrides for a bunch of tests, but they've not been
>>> kept up2date since we had timeouts disabled. So this series first
>>> updates the timeout overrides such that all tests pass when run in
>>> my test gitlab CI pipeline. Then it enables use of meson timeouts.
>>>
>>> We might still hit timeouts due to non-deterministic performance of
>>> gitlab CI runners. So we'll probably have to increase a few more
>>> timeouts in the short term. Fortunately this is going to be massively
>>> easier to diagnose. For example this job during my testing:
>>>
>>> https://gitlab.com/berrange/qemu/-/jobs/4392029495
>>>
>>> we can immediately see the problem tests
>>>
>>> Summary of Failures:
>>> 6/252 qemu:qtest+qtest-i386 / qtest-i386/bios-tables-test TIMEOUT 120.02s killed by signal 15 SIGTERM
>>> 7/252 qemu:qtest+qtest-aarch64 / qtest-aarch64/bios-tables-test TIMEOUT 120.03s killed by signal 15 SIGTERM
>>> 64/252 qemu:qtest+qtest-aarch64 / qtest-aarch64/qom-test TIMEOUT 300.03s killed by signal 15 SIGTERM
>>>
>>> The full meson testlog.txt will show each individual TAP log output,
>>> so we can then see exactly which test case we got stuck on.
>>>
>>> NB, the artifacts are missing on the job links above, until this
>>> patch merges:
>>>
>>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2023-05/msg04668.html
>>>
>>> NB, this series sets the migration-test timeout to 5 minutes, which
>>> is only valid if this series is merged to make the migration test
>>> not suck:
>>>
>>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2023-06/msg00286.html
>>>
>>> without that series, we'll need to set the migration-test timeout to
>>> 30 minutes instead.
>>>
>>> Daniel P. Berrangé (6):
>>> qtest: bump min meson timeout to 60 seconds
>>> qtest: bump migration-test timeout to 5 minutes
>>> qtest: bump qom-test timeout to 7 minutes
>>> qtest: bump aspeed_smc-test timeout to 2 minutes
>>> qtest: bump bios-table-test timeout to 6 minutes
>>> mtest2make: stop disabling meson test timeouts
>>>
>>> scripts/mtest2make.py | 3 ++-
>>> tests/qtest/meson.build | 16 ++++++----------
>>> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> FWIW, I now ran this on my rather old laptop with an --enable-debug
>> build with "make -j$(nproc) check-qtest" and got these additional
>> failures (beside the expected migration-test that still needs its
>> final speedup):
>>
>> qtest-aarch64/test-hmp TIMEOUT 120.07s killed by signal 15 SIGTERM
>> qtest-aarch64/qom-test TIMEOUT 420.09s killed by signal 15 SIGTERM
>> qtest-arm/qom-test TIMEOUT 420.10s killed by signal 15 SIGTERM
>> qtest-arm/npcm7xx_pwm-test TIMEOUT 150.04s killed by signal 15 SIGTERM
>> qtest-ppc64/pxe-test TIMEOUT 60.01s killed by signal 15 SIGTERM
>> qtest-sparc/prom-env-test TIMEOUT 60.01s killed by signal 15 SIGTERM
>> qtest-sparc/boot-serial-test TIMEOUT 60.01s killed by signal 15 SIGTERM
>
> Did you see any others in the 45-60 second time window, as those would
> be candidates for increases too - don't want to have things right below
> the 60 second cutoff ?
The qos-test on arm likely needs some adjustment, too:
qtest-arm/qos-test OK 40.72s 115 subtests passed
qtest-aarch64/qos-test OK 54.00s 108 subtests passed
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-05 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-01 16:31 [PATCH 0/6] tests: enable meson test timeouts to improve debuggability Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 16:31 ` [PATCH 1/6] qtest: bump min meson timeout to 60 seconds Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 18:38 ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-01 16:31 ` [PATCH 2/6] qtest: bump migration-test timeout to 5 minutes Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 18:39 ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-01 16:31 ` [PATCH 3/6] qtest: bump qom-test timeout to 7 minutes Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 19:07 ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-01 16:31 ` [PATCH 4/6] qtest: bump aspeed_smc-test timeout to 2 minutes Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 19:07 ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-05 11:31 ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-05 11:48 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 16:31 ` [PATCH 5/6] qtest: bump bios-table-test timeout to 6 minutes Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 19:10 ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-05 11:37 ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-05 11:49 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 16:31 ` [PATCH 6/6] mtest2make: stop disabling meson test timeouts Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 19:15 ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-01 18:44 ` [PATCH 0/6] tests: enable meson test timeouts to improve debuggability Richard Henderson
2023-06-05 14:07 ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-05 14:14 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-05 15:36 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2023-06-05 15:45 ` Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0f4090d2-02cb-ff7e-bdd8-5814607e1711@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=crosa@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).