From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Fei Li <fli@suse.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-3.1? RFC v2 0/5] fix some segmentation faults and migration issues
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 09:57:12 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0f774e48-892a-de5b-74d2-2a1694e6022f@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <27e46dfa-f874-8b20-7522-f933d0dda897@suse.com>
On 11/30/18 12:15 AM, Fei Li wrote:
>
>
> On 11/29/2018 10:20 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 11/29/18 4:03 AM, Fei Li wrote:
>>> These five patches almost get the Reviewed-by and are extracted from
>>> previous "[PATCH RFC v7 0/9] qemu_thread_create: propagate errors to
>>> callers to check." The mentioned patch series have waited on one
>>> multifd issue for a while and still needs a further discussion.
>>>
>>> Thus separate(send) these five almost-done patches and hope they can
>>> be merged for the next tag. Thanks for the review. :)
>>
>> How likely are any of these crashers to affect an end user?
> IMHO, they are not easily triggered.
A crash at the command line is annoying, but not too bad (because you
didn't start the guest after all). A crash after the guest has been
running for some time, though, is worth considering (data loss should be
avoided). I won't make the final determination on this series, but hope
that my questions are helpful to the maintainers for this code in
ranking the severity of these crashes.
>> Are any of them regressions over 3.0?
> I do not think so.
>> I'm trying to gauge if any of this is serious enough to warrant a
>> -rc4, or if we are okay just documenting them as known corner-case
>> bugs and deferring the fix to 4.0 and qemu-stable.
> Emm, actually not so emergency to be included in -rc4.
> And I think it is ok to wait for maintainers to do the pick for the
> appropriate release.
> BTW, why 4.0, but not 3.2 or 3.3 (I mean 3.minor version)?
See https://www.qemu.org/download/ for the explanation on version numbering
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-30 15:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-29 10:03 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 0/5] fix some segmentation faults and migration issues Fei Li
2018-11-29 10:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 1/5] Fix segmentation fault when qemu_signal_init fails Fei Li
2018-11-29 12:49 ` Markus Armbruster
2018-11-30 3:29 ` Fei Li
2018-11-29 10:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 2/5] qemu_thread_join: fix segmentation fault Fei Li
2018-11-29 10:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 3/5] migration: fix the multifd code when receiving less channels Fei Li
2018-11-29 14:46 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2018-11-30 3:45 ` Fei Li
2018-12-06 6:31 ` Fei Li
2018-11-29 10:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 4/5] migration: remove unused &local_err parameter in multifd_save_cleanup Fei Li
2018-11-29 14:50 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2018-11-29 14:52 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2018-11-30 5:12 ` Fei Li
2018-11-29 10:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 5/5] migration: add more error handling for postcopy_ram_enable_notify Fei Li
2018-11-30 9:49 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2018-11-29 14:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-3.1? RFC v2 0/5] fix some segmentation faults and migration issues Eric Blake
2018-11-30 6:15 ` Fei Li
2018-11-30 15:57 ` Eric Blake [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0f774e48-892a-de5b-74d2-2a1694e6022f@redhat.com \
--to=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=fli@suse.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).