From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GuPBC-0003tK-Mi
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 03:09:30 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GuPBB-0003t8-Ih
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 03:09:29 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GuPBB-0003t5-A2
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 03:09:29 -0500
Received: from [64.233.182.190] (helo=nf-out-0910.google.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GuPBA-0001BK-Uf
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 03:09:29 -0500
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c31so592853nfb
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 00:09:28 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <10541fa50612130009s798a1587n4a3d2b8b51baa334@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:09:27 +0800
From: PianoPan <pianopan@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_533_11689946.1165997367820"
Subject: [Qemu-devel] About performance of qemu-system-arm
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

------=_Part_533_11689946.1165997367820
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Hello, everyone,



Now, I'm planning to use Qemu as our mobile device emulator (ARM). Before
our development, I want to confirm performance of it. I use packages from
http://folks.o-hand.com/richard/qemu.html to build the evaluation
environment, but performance of Linux in Qemu is too slow. It uses about one
hour to boot GUI system.



Can anybody tell me this performance is proper or not?

Best regards!
Piano Pan

------=_Part_533_11689946.1165997367820
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

<span lang="EN-US">Hello, everyone, </span>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">&nbsp;</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Now, I'm planning to use Qemu as our mobile
device emulator (ARM). Before our development, I want to confirm performance of
it. I use packages from <a href="http://folks.o-hand.com/richard/qemu.html">http://folks.o-hand.com/richard/qemu.html</a>
to build the evaluation environment, but performance of Linux in Qemu is too
slow. It uses about one hour to boot GUI system. </span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">&nbsp;</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Can anybody tell me this performance is proper
or not?</span></p><p class="MsoNormal">Best regards!</p>Piano Pan<br>

------=_Part_533_11689946.1165997367820--