From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AEMiJ-0000pK-DX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 00:48:19 -0500 Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AEMhM-0007qc-S6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 00:47:52 -0500 Received: from [203.63.55.34] (helo=wallace.eclinic.com.au) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AEMhC-0006zr-MH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 00:47:11 -0500 From: Leigh Dyer Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1067319999.1257.9.camel@shawn.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 16:46:40 +1100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Math/FP problems in 0.5.0? Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi, I've been playing with both CVS and the 0.5.0 release of qemu today, using a debian system that I installed under bochs. The system boots and seems to run quite well, but I noticed some numerical problems showing up - e2fsck's percentage meter switched between 0.0% and nan%, and running nbench produced similar results, with either 0 or nan for all reported values in the output. I thought that it might be a problem with my toolchain (gcc 3.3 in Debian unstable messes things up, so I use unstable's gcc 3.2), so I grabbed the qemu binary and linux test image from the website. Running df seems to show the problem as well: the Capacity of the filesystem is shown as 0%, and if you use df -h, Size, Used and Avail all show as 0G. Apart from that, I have to say that 0.5.0 is very impressive - keep up the good work :) Thanks Leigh