From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AJ1Il-00010Y-Um for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 09 Nov 2003 20:57:11 -0500 Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AJ1IF-0000t4-9W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 09 Nov 2003 20:57:10 -0500 Received: from [203.63.55.34] (helo=wallace.eclinic.com.au) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AJ1IE-0000oQ-Ev for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 09 Nov 2003 20:56:38 -0500 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Debian Woody system to play with From: Leigh Dyer In-Reply-To: <3FAE72C7.8000201@free.fr> References: <3FAE72C7.8000201@free.fr> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1068425683.602.27.camel@shawn.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 11:54:43 +1100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 04:00, Fabrice Bellard wrote: > Chad Page wrote: > > Cool... I just checked it out and brought it to the SBLUG meeting > > tonight. Got to demonstrate just how much faster qemu is over bochs ;) > > The next step on my end is to find time to write a seg fault handler which > > would print out the code block that caused the crash. Something in "ps" > > does it for instance under both this and the qemu linux image every > > time... I'll have to see if I can replicate it in user space. > > Should work better now. > I've just tested a few things (running ps in a loop, generating a few ssh keys, and rebooting a few times) and I haven't managed to get it to crash yet. Good work :) Thanks Leigh