qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. Mayer" <l_indien@magic.fr>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] PowerPC CPU tester
Date: 03 Dec 2003 10:05:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1070442328.13658.25254.camel@rapid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D87D689B-255F-11D8-B7C0-003065C7D858@mandrakesoft.com>

On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 08:10, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
> Hi,

Hi !

> > Would it be possible to get a readable description of the problems
> > encountered ?
> 
> Hmm, wait, I read XER the wrong way. It seems you used the normal 
> numbering way with 0 being LSB. I have uploaded a new version of 
> test-powerpc.cpp. Sorry, for the inconvience. Only "rlwimi" were wrong 
> indeed.
> 30698 errors out of 689408 tests

Well, I understand. I hate the IBM/Motorola notation....
Can you please give me a detailed report of rlwimi problem ? I think I
found it (missing parenthesis in micro-op).
You may try to replace in translate-ppc/op.c:

Index: target-ppc/op.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/qemu/qemu/target-ppc/op.c,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -d -w -B -b -d -p -r1.2 op.c
--- target-ppc/op.c     23 Nov 2003 16:58:08 -0000      1.2
+++ target-ppc/op.c     3 Dec 2003 08:55:51 -0000
@@ -988,7 +1143,7 @@ PPC_OP(xori)
 /* rotate left word immediate then mask insert */
 PPC_OP(rlwimi)
 {
-    T0 = rotl(T0, PARAM(1) & PARAM(2)) | (T0 & PARAM(3));
+    T0 = (rotl(T0, PARAM(1)) & PARAM(2)) | (T1 & PARAM(3));
     RETURN();
 }

In between, I read more of your code and I now understand better how is
your .dat file to be used.

> >> Testing neg
> >> invalid bits: 00002800 for opcode: 1f -08 - 03 (0x7c6428d0) 
> >> (0x80031890)
> > According to PPC specification, bits 16 to 20 (in IBM/Motorola 
> > notation) have
> > always to be zero, has neg have no rB operand.
> 
> Indeed, copy-paste propagation. ;-) Thanks, for noticing.

Quite common problem :=)
In fact, I noticed that a G4 doesn't report an invalid opcode but I want
to check bad bits in opcodes, at least for testing...

> That's for the tester, it's simply an extra opcode to get out of 
> emulation code, if you know a better way...

All right, I will recode it the same way regular opcodes are. That can
be usefull...

-- 
J. Mayer <l_indien@magic.fr>
Never organized

      reply	other threads:[~2003-12-03 10:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-12-02 15:13 [Qemu-devel] PowerPC CPU tester Gwenole Beauchesne
2003-12-02 22:44 ` J. Mayer
2003-12-03  7:10   ` Gwenole Beauchesne
2003-12-03  9:05     ` J. Mayer [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1070442328.13658.25254.camel@rapid \
    --to=l_indien@magic.fr \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).