From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24)
	id 1Acaji-0002tA-4Z
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 02 Jan 2004 20:37:54 -0500
Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24)
	id 1Acaik-0002JP-5U
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 02 Jan 2004 20:37:26 -0500
Received: from [62.210.158.46] (helo=teheran.magic.fr)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Acahn-0001l0-5B
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 02 Jan 2004 20:35:55 -0500
Received: from 10.0.0.2 (ppp-181.net-555.magic.fr [62.210.255.181])
	by teheran.magic.fr (8.11.6/8.11.2) with ESMTP id i030YNU13131
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sat, 3 Jan 2004 01:34:24 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Segmentation fault with 0.50 and 0.51 and fedora
	core ls
From: "J. Mayer" <l_indien@magic.fr>
In-Reply-To: <1073081971.1277.8.camel@intrepid>
References: <1073011927.29451.5.camel@intrepid>
	<1073013983.7385.9.camel@rapid>  <1073018837.4731.58.camel@intrepid>
	<1073049292.21563.5.camel@rapid>  <1073081971.1277.8.camel@intrepid>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1073089422.21608.17.camel@rapid>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2004 01:23:42 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 23:19, Michael Torrie wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 06:14, J. Mayer wrote:
> > Well, you may rebuild qemu as a static binary on your yellowdog
> > distribution. If it compiles without a problem, you'll win :-)
> > It seems really more simple than trying to make two glibc available on
> > your system...
> 
> What does this have to do with my problem of qemu segfaulting when I run
> x86 binaries?  qemu builds and runs just fine.  So that's not the
> problem.  It already compiles.  Making qemu static will not help my
> problem with glibc (remember it's the x86 glibc that's causing the
> problems, not the ppc version).

Ooops, I misunderstood you. I had some problems with the host glibc on
PPC . So, you're rigth, you may try with a non non-nptl x86 glibc.
Sorry for this mistake...

-- 
J. Mayer <l_indien@magic.fr>
Never organized