From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1Au9cD-00017E-TP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 07:18:45 -0500 Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1Au9Zt-0007Yo-St for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 07:16:53 -0500 Received: from [199.232.41.8] (helo=mx20.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.30) id 1Au9Yj-00075B-E5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 07:15:09 -0500 Received: from [212.152.181.195] (helo=nitweb2.nit-mail.com) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Au9TP-00068h-Am for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 07:09:39 -0500 Received: from 10.0.0.3 (chello212186175067.4.14.vie.surfer.at [212.186.175.67]) by nitweb2.nit-mail.com (8.12.7/8.12.7/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id i1KC9WH8015280 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:09:33 +0100 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] benchmarks From: Gabriel Ebner In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1077278971.30615.14.camel@schnecke2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:09:31 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hello, Am Fre, den 20.02.2004 schrieb Tom Musgrove um 09:34: > If you plan to update your benchmarks, I thought it might be nice to compare > to our commercial competetion on linux (and possibly other OSes). Don't forget bochs. (I know its not commercial, but its AFAIK the only viable free alternative to qemu) Gabriel.