From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.30)
	id 1B45L6-0001lK-4X
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:46:08 -0500
Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30)
	id 1B45Ka-0001cE-L8
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:46:07 -0500
Received: from [62.210.190.9] (helo=brazzaville.magic.fr)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B45Ka-0001bP-4P
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:45:36 -0500
Received: from 10.0.0.2 (ppp-181.net-555.magic.fr [62.210.255.181])
	by brazzaville.magic.fr (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i2ILjNg23032
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 22:45:23 +0100
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu and OS/2
From: "J. Mayer" <l_indien@magic.fr>
In-Reply-To: <c3d3pk$rpp$1@sea.gmane.org>
References: <c35669$sft$1@sea.gmane.org> <4056434B.4070008@bellard.org>
	<c37mip$3ba$2@sea.gmane.org> <1079560975.28616.1554.camel@rapid>
	<c3d3pk$rpp$1@sea.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1079646330.17580.1.camel@rapid>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 22:45:30 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 22:19, Sami Haahtinen wrote:
> J. Mayer wrote:
> > Qemu crashes because of buggy sb16 emulation.
...
> > To make it act this way, you just have to replace all occurences of:
> > msg = (char *)-1;
> > by sthg like:
> > msg = "";
> 
> Did this.
> 
> > Then you may be able to go on...
> 
> The installation still crashes qemu, only thing that is different now is 
> that instead of segfault i now get abort.

My fault:
I missed to tell you to comment the abort call in Fail macro (still in
sb16.c)

> > I can't, cause I haven't got the CDROM and so OS/2 seem to hang (I think
> > the lack of CDROM may be the cause, but...)
> 
> I don't think there is anything special after the first 2 disks, after 
> that the installation just copies the files. so if we can get through 
> the first 2 disks i would guess that things should go well after that.
> Did it ask you for the CD?

In fact, I retried and it's now asking for disk2, so I cannot go on.

Regards.

-- 
J. Mayer <l_indien@magic.fr>
Never organized