From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BUWdJ-00083w-IW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 30 May 2004 16:10:13 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BUWdH-00080D-DO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 30 May 2004 16:10:13 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BUWdH-000802-8V for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 30 May 2004 16:10:11 -0400 Received: from [62.253.162.42] (helo=mta02-svc.ntlworld.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BUWcm-0008AG-0q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 30 May 2004 16:09:40 -0400 Received: from [10.10.10.100] ([81.107.87.144]) by mta02-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.37 201-229-121-137-20020806) with ESMTP id <20040530200831.KYGH8778.mta02-svc.ntlworld.com@[10.10.10.100]> for ; Sun, 30 May 2004 21:08:31 +0100 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Running QEMU on FreeBSD From: Antony T Curtis In-Reply-To: <40BA2EA1.7020104@fabianowski.de> References: <1085865953.93476.3.camel@pcgem.rdg.cyberkinetica.com> <40B902F5.30809@fabianowski.de> <1085867455.93476.10.camel@pcgem.rdg.cyberkinetica.com> <40B90776.60406@fabianowski.de> <1085868567.93476.13.camel@pcgem.rdg.cyberkinetica.com> <40B90DB2.3040508@fabianowski.de> <1085872155.93476.18.camel@pcgem.rdg.cyberkinetica.com> <20040530102509.0f234b19.markus.niemisto@gmx.net> <1085910613.94556.3.camel@pcgem.rdg.cyberkinetica.com> <40B9F2A3.5000707@fabianowski.de> <1085938065.347.1.camel@pcgem.rdg.cyberkinetica.com> <40BA2EA1.7020104@fabianowski.de> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1085947772.347.5.camel@pcgem.rdg.cyberkinetica.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 21:09:32 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Sun, 2004-05-30 at 19:57, Bartosz Fabianowski wrote: > Seems like your newest patch merges all the FreeBSD patches floating > around out there. Good job. > > You didn't merge in one small patch of mine though and I am wondering > why. The patch I am talking about is the one that makes the configure > script look for "sdl11-config" instead of "sdl-config". I have installed > the devel/sdl12 port and the name of the executable is "sdl11-config" on > my system. It must be "sdl-config" on your system since you didn't > include this little patch. And I am curious as to why you have a > different file name. How did you install the SDL? From the ports? If so, > which port? I installed it via the ports but I have a symlink in /usr/local/bin because of a few things which I build from tarballs. Most people will not have that symlink so it would be a good idea to add in your change, --