From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1BUvBu-0004oJ-Jp
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 31 May 2004 18:23:34 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1BUvBr-0004nE-NH
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 31 May 2004 18:23:33 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BUvBr-0004mi-Db
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 31 May 2004 18:23:31 -0400
Received: from [199.232.41.8] (helo=mx20.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
	(Exim 4.34) id 1BUvBU-0005oM-Ak
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 31 May 2004 18:23:08 -0400
Received: from [62.253.162.45] (helo=mta05-svc.ntlworld.com)
	by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BUv4V-00079i-Kf
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 31 May 2004 18:15:55 -0400
Received: from [10.10.10.100] ([81.107.87.144]) by mta05-svc.ntlworld.com
	(InterMail vM.4.01.03.37 201-229-121-137-20020806) with ESMTP
	id <20040531221414.DRRN2927.mta05-svc.ntlworld.com@[10.10.10.100]>
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 31 May 2004 23:14:14 +0100
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Running QEMU on FreeBSD
From: Antony T Curtis <antony.t.curtis@ntlworld.com>
In-Reply-To: <40BB9621.9080704@fabianowski.de>
References: <1085865953.93476.3.camel@pcgem.rdg.cyberkinetica.com>
	<40B902F5.30809@fabianowski.de>
	<1085867455.93476.10.camel@pcgem.rdg.cyberkinetica.com>
	<40B90776.60406@fabianowski.de>
	<1085868567.93476.13.camel@pcgem.rdg.cyberkinetica.com>
	<40B90DB2.3040508@fabianowski.de>
	<1085872155.93476.18.camel@pcgem.rdg.cyberkinetica.com>
	<20040530102509.0f234b19.markus.niemisto@gmx.net>
	<1085910613.94556.3.camel@pcgem.rdg.cyberkinetica.com>
	<40B9F2A3.5000707@fabianowski.de>
	<1085938065.347.1.camel@pcgem.rdg.cyberkinetica.com>
	<40BA2EA1.7020104@fabianowski.de>
	<1085947772.347.5.camel@pcgem.rdg.cyberkinetica.com>
	<40BA7E1A.5080005@fabianowski.de>
	<1085966664.347.8.camel@pcgem.rdg.cyberkinetica.com>
	<40BA8D68.3070204@fabianowski.de>
	<1086011679.347.75.camel@pcgem.rdg.cyberkinetica.com>
	<40BB9621.9080704@fabianowski.de>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1086041747.347.115.camel@pcgem.rdg.cyberkinetica.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 23:15:47 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Mon, 2004-05-31 at 21:31, Bartosz Fabianowski wrote:
> > Ok... I am curious if the following diff helps it (or makes it worse)
> > It is just a quick hack to use the native fpu instructions instead of
> > manual calculation...
> 
> Sorry I didn't have time to try it before. Now I have applied the diff 
> and recompiled. It's back to NaN megabytes, which is really weird, as 
> Windows 98, when run natively on this very computer, with this very FPU, 
> reports the right numbers...

Hmm... my code is obviously broken then.

But I still personally think that there is some error being introduced
by 'emulating' those floating point instructions rather than using the
actual ones.

--