From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1BbLgT-0005v8-Ic
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 11:53:42 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1BbLgQ-0005uP-DY
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 11:53:39 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BbLgQ-0005uM-Bd
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 11:53:38 -0400
Received: from [213.146.130.142] (helo=trantor.org.uk)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
	(Exim 4.34) id 1BbLey-0003cu-53
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 11:52:08 -0400
From: Gianni Tedesco <gianni@scaramanga.co.uk>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-vas8M4CVRekt+qQj3GX1"
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 16:45:00 +0100
Message-Id: <1087573500.3375.175.camel@sherbert>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [USB-OHCI]: Best way to access physical memory?
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org


--=-vas8M4CVRekt+qQj3GX1
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

The USB OHCI driver needs to access host physical memory (to access HCCA
and endpoint descriptors). Should I just read/write directly in to the
buffer pointed to by phys_ram_base, or is there a better way?

Obviously, any I/O memory regions stuffed on the end of 'real' physical
mem won't be accessible if I just go direct to phys_ram_base, but I
doubt anyone relies on that feature...

Fabrice, what do you think?

--=20
// Gianni Tedesco (gianni at scaramanga dot co dot uk)
lynx --source www.scaramanga.co.uk/scaramanga.asc | gpg --import
8646BE7D: 6D9F 2287 870E A2C9 8F60 3A3C 91B5 7669 8646 BE7D

--=-vas8M4CVRekt+qQj3GX1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBA0w38kbV2aYZGvn0RAjbjAKCFwM/c9r51zFdXGweToL3erfeaqwCcCmlD
Vpe9h7NjKX/sJ8OVmhOjrSw=
=5Aun
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-vas8M4CVRekt+qQj3GX1--