qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* intermittent qtest-aarch64/xlnx-canfd-test test failure
@ 2023-09-21  7:51 Michael Tokarev
  2023-10-30 16:19 ` Cédric Le Goater
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michael Tokarev @ 2023-09-21  7:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: QEMU Developers; +Cc: Vikram Garhwal, Francisco Iglesias, Richard Henderson

Hi!

While doing stable-8.1.1 preparation, I've a CI failure of ubuntu-20.04-s390x-all here:

https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/jobs/5132720046

▶ ERROR:../tests/qtest/xlnx-canfd-test.c:265:match_rx_tx_data: \
   assertion failed ((buf_rx[size] & DLC_FD_BIT_MASK) == (buf_tx[size] & DLC_FD_BIT_MASK)): (2281701376 == 2147483648)

  qemu:qtest+qtest-aarch64 / qtest-aarch64/xlnx-canfd-test  \
            ERROR           0.77s   killed by signal 6 SIGABRT

Re-run of this test went successfully.  However, the assert looks
a bit scary, and the fact that it does not fail in a reliable way
is a bit troubling too.  Is it a flaky test or there's something
else in qemu with concurrent threads?

I don't see this assert in previous test runs.  But ubuntu-20.04-s390x-all
test fails quite often due to other reasons, so it isn't conclusive.

Should something be done with this?

The testing is done for commit f2fc49c302036315db6e8c9f74592decc3be0476,
which is in staging-8.1 branch only temporarily.

Thanks,

/mjt


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-11-06 14:50 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-09-21  7:51 intermittent qtest-aarch64/xlnx-canfd-test test failure Michael Tokarev
2023-10-30 16:19 ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-10-31 20:19   ` Vikram Garhwal
2023-11-06 14:47     ` Cédric Le Goater

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).