From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1Bt6Be-0007XS-LR
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 06 Aug 2004 10:59:14 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1Bt6Bc-0007Ww-Ut
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 06 Aug 2004 10:59:14 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Bt6Bc-0007Wt-Sf
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 06 Aug 2004 10:59:12 -0400
Received: from [213.146.154.40] (helo=pentafluge.infradead.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
	(Exim 4.34) id 1Bt67l-0005uw-EQ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 06 Aug 2004 10:55:13 -0400
Received: from [213.86.99.236] (helo=[172.16.18.64])
	by pentafluge.infradead.org with asmtp (Exim 4.33 #1 (Red Hat Linux))
	id 1Bt67g-0003Lj-LJ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 06 Aug 2004 15:55:11 +0100
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] ARM in big endian mode?
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040711234327.GA16750@xi.wantstofly.org>
References: <20040703160324.GD8894@xi.wantstofly.org>
	<1088940620.840.1.camel@sherbert>
	<20040704115730.GA21047@xi.wantstofly.org>
	<1089587847.4217.10.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<20040711234327.GA16750@xi.wantstofly.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1091804107.4383.4898.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 15:55:07 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 01:43 +0200, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 12:17:27AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> 
> > > % ./qemu-arm ./x
> > > qemu: uncaught target signal 11 (Segmentation fault) - exiting
  <...>
> Just checked, and indeed, LE binaries segfault too.
  <...>
> So it looks like it (might have) worked in the past but broke somewhere
> between then and now.

Are you using a newer glibc now than the one you were using before?

-- 
dwmw2