From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Inquiry, speed comparison on OS X, QEMU vs Virtual PC
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 11:56:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1092308162.15466.111.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1089464888.29042.23012.camel@rapid>
On Sat, 2004-07-10 at 15:08 +0200, J. Mayer wrote:
> Le 9 juil. 04, à 22:07, Natalia Portillo a écrit :
> >
> > > I think that including support for the PowerPC swapping instructions
> > > in QEMU
> > > will break compatibility with host PowerPCs before G3, so that
> > > instructions
> > > should be used in a run-time capability detection scheme.
> > >
>
> On Sat, 2004-07-10 at 14:47, Pierre d'Herbemont wrote:
> > Which PowerPC Implementations? According to The PowerPC Architecture
> > Book, all the implementation 601,603,604,620 should include support for
> > the lwbrx and stwbrx instructions.
>
> I think all PPC include those instructions and gcc already uses them for
> endian-swapping.
I definitely think gcc could do with __attribute__((littleendian)) :)
--
dwmw2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-12 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-02 22:56 [Qemu-devel] [Patch] Mac OS X Port Pierre d'Herbemont
2004-07-03 13:34 ` Jean-Michel POURE
2004-07-04 7:21 ` [Qemu-devel] " Christian Walther
2004-07-04 10:08 ` Pierre d'Herbemont
2004-07-04 10:37 ` Leigh Dyer
2004-07-05 1:22 ` [Qemu-devel] " Leigh Dyer
2004-07-05 22:24 ` [Qemu-devel] Inquiry, speed comparison on OS X, QEMU vs Virtual PC Daniel J. Guinan
2004-07-06 0:23 ` Leigh Dyer
2004-07-06 0:29 ` dguinan
2004-07-09 19:37 ` Pierre d'Herbemont
2004-07-09 20:07 ` Natalia Portillo
2004-07-09 20:14 ` Chad Page
2004-07-10 12:47 ` Pierre d'Herbemont
2004-07-10 13:08 ` J. Mayer
2004-07-10 13:23 ` Pierre d'Herbemont
2004-07-10 14:05 ` J. Mayer
2004-08-12 10:56 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2004-08-12 12:51 ` Pierre d'Herbemont
2004-07-10 13:14 ` Fabrice Bellard
2004-07-10 13:27 ` Pierre d'Herbemont
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1092308162.15466.111.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).