From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CGG3t-00012r-FL
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2004 08:10:57 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CGG3s-00011L-Im
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2004 08:10:56 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CGG3s-00010n-DM
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2004 08:10:56 -0400
Received: from [195.130.132.58] (helo=astra.telenet-ops.be)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CGFwY-0005Tx-Br
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2004 08:03:22 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by astra.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 6AB55328196
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sat,  9 Oct 2004 14:03:21 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from [192.168.1.2] (d51A51CF1.kabel.telenet.be [81.165.28.241])
	by astra.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D884328183
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sat,  9 Oct 2004 14:03:21 +0200 (MEST)
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu crashes and freezes on x86_64/amd64 host
From: Bob Deblier <bob.deblier@telenet.be>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0410091206090.1174@wgmdd8.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
References: <1097175246.2833.51.camel@orion>
	<cd8ecdef04100817224ea0b06c@mail.gmail.com>
	<1097299793.2834.18.camel@orion>
	<Pine.LNX.4.58.0410091206090.1174@wgmdd8.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1097323401.2828.16.camel@orion>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2004 14:03:21 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Sat, 2004-10-09 at 12:08, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> I don't know if that works, but what about valgrind? If QEmu can run
> itself, valgrind should do a fine (if slow) job of detecting where a
> pointer is passed incompletely... It would be slow, but also the lazy
> way...

Valgrind is x86 only - I'm running Fedora Core 2 x86_64 a.k.a. amd64
i.e. 64-bit native. I have no problems on Fedora Core 2 x86. 

Were you suggesting running qemu 32-bit in valgrind inside qemu 64-bit?
That wouldn't do much good, I'm afraid.

Bob