From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Dmitry Fleytman <dmitry.fleytman@gmail.com>,
Akihiko Odaki <odaki@rsg.ci.i.u-tokyo.ac.jp>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
Sriram Yagnaraman <sriram.yagnaraman@ericsson.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
Luigi Rizzo <lrizzo@google.com>,
Giuseppe Lettieri <g.lettieri@iet.unipi.it>,
Vincenzo Maffione <v.maffione@gmail.com>,
Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 08/13] qmp: update virtio features map to support extended features
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 09:07:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <10982e4b-2b76-401d-8ad1-b4949f655ca7@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87seiswtup.fsf@pond.sub.org>
On 7/19/25 8:57 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> Extend the VirtioDeviceFeatures struct with an additional u64
>> to track unknown features in the 64-127 bit range and decode
>> the full virtio features spaces for vhost and virtio devices.
>>
>> Also add entries for the soon-to-be-supported virtio net GSO over
>> UDP features.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
>
> [...]
>
>> diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-qmp.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-qmp.c
>> index 3b6377cf0d..03c6163cf4 100644
>> --- a/hw/virtio/virtio-qmp.c
>> +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-qmp.c
>
> [...]
>
>> @@ -680,9 +715,10 @@ VirtioDeviceFeatures *qmp_decode_features(uint16_t device_id, uint64_t bitmap)
>> g_assert_not_reached();
>> }
>>
>> - features->has_unknown_dev_features = bitmap != 0;
>> + features->has_unknown_dev_features = !virtio_features_empty(bitmap);
>> if (features->has_unknown_dev_features) {
>> - features->unknown_dev_features = bitmap;
>> + features->unknown_dev_features = bitmap[0];
>> + features->unknown_dev_features2 = bitmap[1];
>> }
>
> Why not assign unconditionally?
I stuck with the old/previous code style. I can move to unconditional
assignment in the next revision.
>> return features;
>
> [...]
>
>> diff --git a/qapi/virtio.json b/qapi/virtio.json
>> index 9d652fe4a8..f2e2dd6e97 100644
>> --- a/qapi/virtio.json
>> +++ b/qapi/virtio.json
>> @@ -490,14 +490,18 @@
>> # unique features)
>> #
>> # @unknown-dev-features: Virtio device features bitmap that have not
>> -# been decoded
>> +# been decoded (bits 0-63)
>> +#
>> +# @unknown-dev-features2: Virtio device features bitmap that have not
>> +# been decoded (bits 64-127)
>> #
>> # Since: 7.2
>> ##
>> { 'struct': 'VirtioDeviceFeatures',
>> 'data': { 'transports': [ 'str' ],
>> '*dev-features': [ 'str' ],
>> - '*unknown-dev-features': 'uint64' } }
>> + '*unknown-dev-features': 'uint64',
>> + '*unknown-dev-features2': 'uint64' } }
>>
>> ##
>> # @VirtQueueStatus:
>
> I wish we could simply widen @unknown-dev-features, but we don't have
> uint128, and adding it would risk breaking QMP clients. 64 bit integers
> are already troublesome in JSON.
>
> Does the example in x-query-virtio-status's doc comment need an update?
Yes, you are right, the output for the 'unknown features' field will
include leading zeros for the high 64 bits.
I will update it in the next revision, thanks!
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-21 7:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-18 8:52 [PATCH RFC v3 00/13] virtio: introduce support for GSO over UDP tunnel Paolo Abeni
2025-07-18 8:52 ` [PATCH RFC v3 01/13] net: bundle all offloads in a single struct Paolo Abeni
2025-07-20 10:31 ` Akihiko Odaki
2025-07-18 8:52 ` [PATCH RFC v3 02/13] linux-headers: Update to Linux ~v6.16-rc5 net-next Paolo Abeni
2025-07-18 8:52 ` [PATCH RFC v3 03/13] virtio: introduce extended features type Paolo Abeni
2025-07-20 10:41 ` Akihiko Odaki
2025-07-21 7:33 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-07-21 7:49 ` Akihiko Odaki
2025-07-21 8:45 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-07-18 8:52 ` [PATCH RFC v3 04/13] virtio: serialize extended features state Paolo Abeni
2025-07-18 15:06 ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-07-20 10:44 ` Akihiko Odaki
2025-07-21 7:51 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-07-21 7:55 ` Akihiko Odaki
2025-07-18 8:52 ` [PATCH RFC v3 05/13] virtio: add support for negotiating extended features Paolo Abeni
2025-07-18 8:52 ` [PATCH RFC v3 06/13] virtio-pci: implement support for " Paolo Abeni
2025-07-22 3:28 ` Jason Wang
2025-07-22 7:37 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-07-23 5:47 ` Jason Wang
2025-07-23 11:21 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-07-18 8:52 ` [PATCH RFC v3 07/13] vhost: add support for negotiating " Paolo Abeni
2025-07-18 14:36 ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-07-21 2:53 ` Lei Yang
2025-07-21 8:21 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-07-21 7:00 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-07-22 3:32 ` Jason Wang
2025-07-22 16:55 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-07-23 5:56 ` Jason Wang
2025-07-18 8:52 ` [PATCH RFC v3 08/13] qmp: update virtio features map to support " Paolo Abeni
2025-07-18 10:18 ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-07-18 10:23 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-07-18 10:28 ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-07-19 6:57 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-07-21 7:07 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2025-07-21 7:23 ` Akihiko Odaki
2025-07-21 7:45 ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-07-21 8:04 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-07-18 8:52 ` [PATCH RFC v3 09/13] vhost-backend: implement extended features support Paolo Abeni
2025-07-18 8:52 ` [PATCH RFC v3 10/13] vhost-net: " Paolo Abeni
2025-07-18 13:01 ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-07-18 14:33 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-07-18 8:52 ` [PATCH RFC v3 11/13] virtio-net: " Paolo Abeni
2025-07-18 8:52 ` [PATCH RFC v3 12/13] net: implement tunnel probing Paolo Abeni
2025-07-18 11:17 ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-07-21 8:48 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-07-22 3:50 ` Jason Wang
2025-07-22 7:33 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-07-23 5:47 ` Jason Wang
2025-07-22 4:15 ` Akihiko Odaki
2025-07-18 8:52 ` [PATCH RFC v3 13/13] net: implement UDP tunnel features offloading Paolo Abeni
2025-07-18 13:22 ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-07-18 13:44 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-07-18 13:48 ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-07-18 15:21 ` Stefano Garzarella
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=10982e4b-2b76-401d-8ad1-b4949f655ca7@redhat.com \
--to=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=dmitry.fleytman@gmail.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=g.lettieri@iet.unipi.it \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=lrizzo@google.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=odaki@rsg.ci.i.u-tokyo.ac.jp \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=sriram.yagnaraman@ericsson.com \
--cc=v.maffione@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).