From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CYtVz-00018b-Ql
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:56:59 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CYtVz-00018P-Dt
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:56:59 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CYtVz-00018L-Bj
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:56:59 -0500
Received: from [216.254.0.203] (helo=mail3.speakeasy.net)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
	(Exim 4.34) id 1CYtMR-0005XJ-9w
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:47:07 -0500
Received: from dsl081-088-222.lax1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO [192.168.111.2])
	([64.81.88.222]) (envelope-sender <jhoger@pobox.com>)
	by mail3.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; 29 Nov 2004 21:47:02 -0000
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] iemulator
From: "John R. Hogerhuis" <jhoger@pobox.com>
In-Reply-To: <255DFC56-4244-11D9-8EB4-000A959CB196@alum.mit.edu>
References: <255DFC56-4244-11D9-8EB4-000A959CB196@alum.mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1101764836.341.2369.camel@aragorn>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 13:47:16 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: jhoger@pobox.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 12:20, Ronnie Misra wrote:
> Maybe you guys have already seen this, but:
> 
> <http://www.iemulator.com/>
> 
>  From their FAQ:
> 
> > Is iEmulator based on the BOCHS emulator?
> >    No! BOCHS is a fantastic, flexible effort, but we found it to be 
> > too slow to be "day-to-day usable" on the majority of hardware we 
> > tested with. In all of the tests we've tried, our solution, based on 
> > the powerful qemu codebase, runs significantly quicker!
> 
> Ronnie
> 

Another question is if they've advanced the sourcebase at all.

Given that they are selling it for about $24, it would only cost that
much for someone to become a customer and then ask for source to all
GPLed portions of the codebase. But my guess is this is simply a front
end to QEMU.

Nice I guess that they mentioned QEMU somewhere on their site (the
FAQ)...

-- John.