qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] LICENSE: clarify
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:29:16 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <110244153.8008770.1375345756577.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51F93FE0.8040204@weilnetz.de>

> > -1) QEMU as a whole is released under the GNU General Public License
> > +1) QEMU as a whole is released under the GNU General Public License,
> > +version 2.
> 
> I appreciate these clarifications. For point 1, I suggest
> 
> ... version 2 or (at your option) any later version.

As Eric explained, I wish this was true! :)

I explained this in the commit message, too:
> > 1) The GPL says that "if the Program does not specify a version number
> > of this License, you may choose any version ever published by the Free
> > Software Foundation".  This is not true, QEMU includes parts that are
> > v2-only.

> > -Fabrice Bellard.
> > +Fabrice Bellard and the QEMU team
> 
> "QEMU team" is rather unspecific. Who is member of the QEMU team?
> 
> * People with commit rights?
> * All maintainers listed in MAINTAINERS?
> * Participants of the KVM calls?
> * QEMU contributors working for Redhat, IBM, SUSE?
> * All contributors?
> 
> Fabrice Bellard and all QEMU contributors would be more specific.

Certainly these rules have to be understood by committers, but QEMU
team is intended in the most generic sense.  It just means "people
who care about these rules"---everyone else agrees to them by providing
the Signed-off-by lines in their commit messages, and this includes
many from RH/IBM/SuSE.

"XYZ team" occurs frequently in copyright notices, and I don't think
the interpretation of it is going to be a problem.

Paolo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-08-01  8:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-31  6:19 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Clarify licensing terms Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-31  6:19 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] raw: add license header Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-31  7:52   ` Kevin Wolf
2013-07-31  8:01   ` Markus Armbruster
2013-08-02  7:01     ` Peter Lieven
2013-07-31 10:49   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-07-31 12:24   ` Jeff Cody
2013-07-31 13:04   ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-08-01  8:13   ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-08-01  8:38     ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-15 13:16     ` Anthony Liguori
2013-07-31  6:19 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] LICENSE: clarify Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-31  7:27   ` Erik de Castro Lopo
2013-07-31  7:40   ` Andreas Färber
2013-07-31 16:48   ` Stefan Weil
2013-07-31 16:58     ` Eric Blake
2013-08-01  8:29     ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2013-07-31 17:40   ` Anthony Liguori
2013-08-01  8:21     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-20 19:06   ` Christopher Covington
2013-07-31 15:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Clarify licensing terms Artyom Tarasenko
2013-08-14 16:29 ` Anthony Liguori

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=110244153.8008770.1375345756577.JavaMail.root@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=sw@weilnetz.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).