qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "John R. Hogerhuis" <jhoger@pobox.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] SMB for DOS ?
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 12:48:16 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1103402896.21894.66.camel@aragorn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200412181832.24252.paul@codesourcery.com>

On Sat, 2004-12-18 at 10:32, Paul Brook wrote:
> > > I hope you will not forget us poor mac users. Optimizing x86 on ppc
> > > performance would make a number of people very happy, I'd say.
> >
> > performance on ppc can become very good because
> > there are much more registers available for emulating
> > the x86 stuff ...
> 
> The really slow bit tends to be MMU emulation, and more host registers doesn't 
> help here. Mapping all guest registers directly onto host registers probably 
> doesn't make all that much difference as the values will tend to be in L1 
> cache anyway.
> 
> Paul
> 

This raises an interesting question in my mind, given the existence of
"reconfigurable computing" where you have a PCI card containing an FPGA
loaded onto your machine (such things do exist, and I expect in the
future to start seeing these things standard on motherboards). Certainly
an MMU can be created in FPGA code. There is an interesting article on
reconfigurable computing in this month's Linux Journal, btw.

What kinds of generic hardware based support would really speed up
emulation of other CPUs? Of course, one could also ask the question of
what would be an ideal CPU instruction set for emulating other CPUs. But
if one narrowed the focus to things that could be accomplished by an
FPGA hooked to the bus, it could actually be implemented by anyone with
the interest to do it, whereas making a new CPU is an expensive
undertaking.

Might be an interesting project for a graduate student.

-- John.

  reply	other threads:[~2004-12-18 21:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-12-16 22:38 [Qemu-devel] SMB for DOS ? Fabrice Bellard
2004-12-16 22:48 ` Adrian Smarzewski
2004-12-16 23:10   ` Fabrice Bellard
2004-12-16 23:32     ` Adrian Smarzewski
2004-12-16 23:34     ` Johannes Schindelin
2004-12-16 23:41       ` Fabrice Bellard
2004-12-16 23:41     ` Laurent Amon
2004-12-16 23:49       ` optimizations, was " Johannes Schindelin
2004-12-18 18:13       ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-12-18 18:32         ` Paul Brook
2004-12-18 20:48           ` John R. Hogerhuis [this message]
2004-12-19  1:05             ` André Braga
2004-12-19  5:27           ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-12-18 18:03     ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-12-16 23:04 ` Ryan Underwood
2004-12-17 11:14 ` Andreas Bollhalder
2004-12-17 12:43   ` malc

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1103402896.21894.66.camel@aragorn \
    --to=jhoger@pobox.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).