From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Cve10-0003xr-Dg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 11:03:02 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Cve0m-0003sw-SV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 11:02:53 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Cve0j-0003jF-Ql for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 11:02:45 -0500 Received: from [213.228.0.44] (helo=postfix3-1.free.fr) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CvdRI-0000B7-GI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 10:26:08 -0500 Message-ID: <1107185167.41fe4e0f15d19@imp5-q.free.fr> Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:26:07 +0100 From: zitu Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-fast target removal ? References: <41FC04A8.5090308@bellard.org> <20050130204619.GA14598@mail.13thfloor.at> <41FD5690.2020605@bellard.org> In-Reply-To: <41FD5690.2020605@bellard.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Fabrice Bellard Quoting Fabrice Bellard : > > any numbers for that? will it be compareable? > > All I can say is that for Linux or Windows user code (such as nbench), > the performance is the same as the native one. cool. bye bye vmw**** > > what will it require? > > A small host kernel module is needed. It works with 2.4 and 2.6 Linux > kernels. ok, means no go for winXP hosts, right ? Will the soft-mmu new std target support winXP hosts ? One last question: when will the new kernel module/layer be available as alpha ? Thanks Fabrice & co for this *wonder* Zitu