From: Thayne Harbaugh <thayne@realmsys.com>
To: "J. Mayer" <l_indien@magic.fr>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: PPC fixes for qemu/OpenHackWare
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 15:25:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1107901543.14935.48.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1107900694.10555.22.camel@rapid>
On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 23:11 +0100, J. Mayer wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 20:45, Thayne Harbaugh wrote:
> > These fixes greatly improve qemu booting on PPC - many Linux
> > distributions with kernel 2.4 now work. It's two big patches (one for
> > qemu, one for OpenHackWare) - let me know if someone prefers them broken
> > out into smaller pieces.
> >
> > There's still some work to be done to get PREP in good shape as well as
> > a Linux 2.6 kernel to work well - expect some more patches in the near
> > future.
>
> Hi.
> Thanks for the work. I need to take a close look of your patches because
> I completely restructured OHW. For example, HFS code is quite different
> in my working repository (but still have problems on some fs)...
>
> I have a few remarks about the patches:
> * in Qemu:
> pci_enabled option should not be used for PPC emulation: we don't
> emulate MCA, so PCI is mandatory for PREP and the Mac target is Mac99
> which also always have PCI.
> The rest of the patch seems OK, imho.
Okay. I'm shooting in the dark, somewhat. I don't really have any
PREP/CHRP hardware - I'm just going off of some random lspci outputs I
have found with Google. I do know, however, that the PREP PCI host
bridge is incorrect in Pearpc, Qemu and OpenHackWare.
Does anyone have a Linux 2.6 /sys tree for PREP and CHRP? That would be
most useful for getting all the ISA, PCI and other devices correct.
> I can't compare OHW for now, as it seems that most of the patch is
> cosmetic (blanks, tabs) and as most files have changed. Could you please
> regenerate the patch using:
> --ignore-all-space --ignore-blank-lines --ignore-space-change --minimal
> -p
> options to make it easier to read ?
I'm a bit confused. I closely reviewed the patch prior to sending and I
didn't notice any instances of whitespace-only diff. There are,
however, many lines of spelling changes. :) controler -> controller,
recurs -> recurse, to -> too, etc..
> I'll send you my current working version of OHW by mail so you can
> compare and see where your patches can still apply easily (while I'll
> try too...).
I'll look for it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-08 22:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-08 19:45 [Qemu-devel] PPC fixes for qemu/OpenHackWare Thayne Harbaugh
2005-02-08 20:46 ` Fabrice Bellard
2005-02-08 21:06 ` Thayne Harbaugh
2005-02-08 22:12 ` Hetz Ben Hamo
2005-02-08 22:11 ` [Qemu-devel] " J. Mayer
2005-02-08 22:25 ` Thayne Harbaugh [this message]
2005-02-08 23:32 ` J. Mayer
2005-02-09 18:50 ` [Qemu-devel] " Thayne Harbaugh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1107901543.14935.48.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=thayne@realmsys.com \
--cc=l_indien@magic.fr \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).