From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D06bL-0006GW-RU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 18:23:00 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D06b1-0006A0-6e for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 18:22:45 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D06ay-00065w-KQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 18:22:36 -0500 Received: from [211.29.132.196] (helo=mail15.syd.optusnet.com.au) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1D06Cz-0004yY-HA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 17:57:50 -0500 Received: from 192.168.0.254 (d220-236-58-140.dsl.nsw.optusnet.com.au [220.236.58.140]) by mail15.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j1CMviIs012645 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 09:57:44 +1100 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] FreeOSZoo will stop March 1, 2005 From: Darrin Ritter In-Reply-To: <715d3905bcba4149077ab7c26f09737c@axiros.com> References: <200502121018.09039.jm@poure.com> <420DD7F8.5080805@wasp.net.au> <8c93d882b06fc13db0eda968a8f261ec@axiros.com> <420E07E2.5090106@wasp.net.au> <345371aff0fb0626b3d6f11161d57ad0@axiros.com> <118123041.20050212191149@ena.si> <715d3905bcba4149077ab7c26f09737c@axiros.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 09:31:26 +1030 Message-Id: <1108249287.6311.5.camel@George> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Here Goes the Flame war!!!!! If a developer that is using GNU/linux for free is Developing a program that will only be proprietary the they may as well stop using the free software and go back to a proprietary system, they are already benefiting from the hours of work that some one else has put into developing software and it is hypocritical to close source your code and use free (as in freedom) software dv On Sat, 2005-02-12 at 22:18 +0100, Daniel Egger wrote: > On 12.02.2005, at 19:11, Jernej Simon=E8i=E8 wrote: >=20 > > Isn't the performance penalty only if you compare current Qemu with a= nd > > without the kernel module, and the speed without the module hasn't=20 > > changed > > compared to Qemu from before KQemu was available? >=20 > Nope, qemu-fast uses a patched Linux kernel (yes, the guest can > *only* be Linux) to run Linux at very-close-to-native speed > with very little translation in a different address space. >=20 > If you only intend to run Linux VMs and don't have a problem > patching the kernel sources this is a very viable approach to > get something which is not possible anymore *without* kqemu > which is more flexible but does only run on 32bit kernels ATM. >=20 > Servus, > Daniel > _______________________________________________ > Qemu-devel mailing list > Qemu-devel@nongnu.org > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel --=20