From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DEHac-0004nG-Ie for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:56:51 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DEHaL-0004da-Hv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:56:33 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DEHaI-0004bX-EC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:56:30 -0500 Received: from [212.250.162.15] (helo=mta05-winn.mailhost.ntl.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DEHGD-0000wm-QS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:35:46 -0500 Received: from aamta04-winn.mailhost.ntl.com ([212.250.162.8]) by mta05-winn.mailhost.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20050324013545.ERGI12099.mta05-winn.mailhost.ntl.com@aamta04-winn.mailhost.ntl.com> for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 01:35:45 +0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([81.107.94.210]) by aamta04-winn.mailhost.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20050324013545.IRG1352.aamta04-winn.mailhost.ntl.com@localhost.localdomain> for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 01:35:45 +0000 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] kqemu port to FreeBSD 5.x + qemu patch From: Antony T Curtis In-Reply-To: <20050323192936.GA80428@bofh.enst.fr> References: <20050323192936.GA80428@bofh.enst.fr> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 01:35:42 +0000 Message-Id: <1111628142.2588.39.camel@pcgem.xiphis.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 20:29 +0100, Pierre Beyssac wrote: > Hello, > > I have written a kqemu wrapper for FreeBSD 5.x (attached). It seems > to work (I've had no crash at all) but it's alpha quality and it > currently lacks working kqemu_free_page() and kqemu_vfree() hooks > (which were never called by kqemu-mid-i386.o in my tests). This is the great thing about opensource - theres often more than one way to do things. The latest iteration of my code is attached and it does work on both FreeBSD 4.9 and FreeBSD 5.3 - except that OS/2 Warp 4 doesn't seem to like running with kqemu. This version seems a lot more stable, I guess someone is going to have to decide which is the better wrapper. -- Antony T Curtis, BSc. UNIX, Linux, *BSD, Networking antony.t.curtis@ntlworld.com C++, J2EE, Perl, MySQL, Apache IT Consultancy.