From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DW6Ep-0000q9-29
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2005 01:27:59 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DW6Ek-0000mO-2h
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2005 01:27:54 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DW6Ej-0000kW-Iu
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2005 01:27:53 -0400
Received: from [69.17.117.24] (helo=mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1DW6GN-00078g-IX
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2005 01:29:35 -0400
Received: from dsl081-088-222.lax1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO [192.168.111.2])
	([64.81.88.222]) (envelope-sender <jhoger@pobox.com>)
	by mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; 12 May 2005 05:22:41 -0000
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu on dsp anyone?
From: "John R. Hogerhuis" <jhoger@pobox.com>
In-Reply-To: <4282B989.3090108@sympatico.ca>
References: <4282B989.3090108@sympatico.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 22:23:25 -0700
Message-Id: <1115875405.17723.111.camel@aragorn>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: jhoger@pobox.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 22:03 -0400, Olivier Bourgois wrote:

> Has anybody tinkered with porting qemu to something like a TI TMS320C6X 
> DSP host.  The idea would be to be able to easily port LINUX and other 
> open source software to such a DSP.

I would think porting uCLinux would be a better idea. Why give up so
much performance to emulation overhead?

-- John.