From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DiHhr-0002HY-C8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 16:08:19 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DiHho-0002Ft-Er for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 16:08:18 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DiHhn-0002FO-Sq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 16:08:15 -0400 Received: from [69.17.117.28] (helo=mail26.sea5.speakeasy.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1DiHR2-0002op-9w for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 15:50:56 -0400 Received: from dsl081-088-222.lax1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO [192.168.111.2]) ([64.81.88.222]) (envelope-sender ) by mail26.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 14 Jun 2005 19:49:12 -0000 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Looking for an easy way to exchange data bidirectional between host and guest (including some suggestion) From: "John R. Hogerhuis" In-Reply-To: <46d6db6605061305523793e19e@mail.gmail.com> References: <42A061E3.8010804@xtal.rwth-aachen.de> <20050606142848.GA21394@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org> <20050608182439.GA25845@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org> <20050611205850.GA7047@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org> <46d6db6605061114293bc84546@mail.gmail.com> <46d6db6605061301597cb7095a@mail.gmail.com> <441261340.20050613135528@ena.si> <46d6db6605061305523793e19e@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 12:49:39 -0700 Message-Id: <1118778579.9735.532.camel@aragorn> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: jhoger@pobox.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Christian MICHON On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 14:52 +0200, Christian MICHON wrote: > > Did you try passive mode? > > nice suggestion. > passive mode off: "dir" lasts forever... > passive mode on: "dir" give "connection refused". > > any idea? > > Christian > Suggest some packet sniffs to see who is getting stuck. -- John.