* [Qemu-devel] qemu vs. win4lin pro
@ 2005-09-01 6:40 Stefan Kombrink
2005-09-01 8:10 ` John R. Hogerhuis
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Kombrink @ 2005-09-01 6:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Hi there,
I tried win4lin pro and found it very similar to running win2k using qemu.
Speed (of graphics) is not higher and it uses the same hardware.
Does it contain less bugs than qemu or what's the advantage that makes user
pay 89$ for it?
greetings,
Stefan K. >8^)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs. win4lin pro
2005-09-01 6:40 [Qemu-devel] qemu vs. win4lin pro Stefan Kombrink
@ 2005-09-01 8:10 ` John R. Hogerhuis
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: John R. Hogerhuis @ 2005-09-01 8:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel, katakombi
On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 08:40 +0200, Stefan Kombrink wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I tried win4lin pro and found it very similar to running win2k using qemu.
> Speed (of graphics) is not higher and it uses the same hardware.
> Does it contain less bugs than qemu or what's the advantage that makes user
> pay 89$ for it?
>
Never used it, but here's their answer to this question:
http://www.win4lin.com/content/view/131/155/
So you're not imagining that it behaves similar to QEMU. As to whether
$X for support, smoothing rough edges and whatnot is worth it to party
Y, only Y can say.
For myself, I like my computers to need me. If everything just worked,
aside from being bored, I'd be superfluous! So I get my QEMU from source
control.
-- John.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-09-01 8:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-09-01 6:40 [Qemu-devel] qemu vs. win4lin pro Stefan Kombrink
2005-09-01 8:10 ` John R. Hogerhuis
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).