From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EBjE3-0006IV-WB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2005 21:23:16 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EBjDs-0006Ba-Hv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2005 21:23:06 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EBjDs-0006BQ-F4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2005 21:23:04 -0400 Received: from [212.247.155.193] (helo=swip.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EBjCY-0002q8-9m for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2005 21:21:42 -0400 Received: from [83.182.16.123] (HELO aphrodite.beeznest.net) by mailfe15.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.4) with ESMTP id 15833401 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 03:18:09 +0200 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Building qemu on UltraSparc From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=E9r=F4me?= Warnier In-Reply-To: <1116720796.22804.23.camel@aphrodite.beeznest.net> References: <1116696732.21446.2.camel@aphrodite.beeznest.net> <20050521232606.GB24431@MAIL.13thfloor.at> <1116720796.22804.23.camel@aphrodite.beeznest.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 03:13:55 +0200 Message-Id: <1125796436.19593.60.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: List qemu-devel Le dimanche 22 mai 2005 =E0 02:13 +0200, J=E9r=F4me Warnier a =E9crit : > Le dimanche 22 mai 2005 =E0 01:26 +0200, Herbert Poetzl a =E9crit : > > On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 07:32:11PM +0200, J=E9r=F4me Warnier wrote: > > > I'm trying to build qEmu v0.7.0 on Debian Sarge on a Sparc64 machine, > > > and it fails with strange errors. > > > Does anybody here have any idea to help me achieve it? > >=20 > > well, looks like you hit 32 vs 64 bit issues here, don't know > > the details about the sparc/64 support but I'd try to build > > as sparc32 first and see how far that gets ... > I tried that (starting with utility sparc32), and it even fails faster. > See the log attached. The same error still happens with 0.7.1. > > HTH, > > Herbert >=20 > > > I attach the log of the build to this mail. > > >=20 > > > Thanks >=20 > Thanks for your help. >=20 > [..]