From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EK0BO-0004iA-9g for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 17:06:42 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EK0BK-0004gE-EZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 17:06:39 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EK0BJ-0004Sq-7A for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 17:06:37 -0400 Received: from [69.17.117.24] (helo=mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1EK0BI-0006UI-Q2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 17:06:37 -0400 Received: from dsl081-088-222.lax1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO [192.168.111.2]) (jhoger@[64.81.88.222]) (envelope-sender ) by mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 26 Sep 2005 21:05:24 -0000 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] getting past the ctrl-alt-del login in NT From: "John R. Hogerhuis" In-Reply-To: <20050926200857.GA17299@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org> References: <200509252158.30634.wes.parish@paradise.net.nz> <20050925102814.GA3703@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de> <4336935C.2010909@eridani.co.uk> <41e41e7a050925060070954243@mail.gmail.com> <1127756677.22730.19.camel@aragorn> <20050926200857.GA17299@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 14:05:39 -0700 Message-Id: <1127768739.29525.6.camel@aragorn> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: jhoger@pobox.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Jim C. Brown" On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 16:08 -0400, Jim C. Brown wrote: > CTRL-ALT-4 is the parallel port console, parallel0. If you added more consoles, > those would take up more numbers. Of course, theres no reason why we can't > map CTRL-ALT-D to CTRL-ALT-DELETE in the guest, CTRL-ALT-P to the Pause/Break > key, CTRL-ALT-B to CTRL-ALT-BACKSPACE, etc. > Yes, those mappings make more sense than what I was saying (easier to remember and no confusion with consoles). To top if off, maybe CTRL-ALT-H or CTRL-ALT-? which pops up a list of the current mappings in case you forget. -- John.