From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EVsjr-0003Da-Jp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 11:35:23 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EVsjp-0003DO-P0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 11:35:23 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EVsjp-0003DL-BR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 11:35:21 -0400 Received: from [62.75.222.204] (helo=rom185.server4you.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EVsjp-0001Lj-Dn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 11:35:21 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.23] (port-212-202-49-191.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.49.191]) by rom185.server4you.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A5B1300E7E for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 17:35:18 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu 0.7.2 and gcc 4 From: "Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter" In-Reply-To: <20051026005049.GA20683@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org> References: <1130276760.16026.51.camel@zeitgeist> <20051026005049.GA20683@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 17:39:48 +0200 Message-Id: <1130600389.6060.10.camel@zeitgeist> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org hm i see. well, when will gcc 4 be working with qemu? i'm asking because my distribution switched to gcc 4 a while ago. On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 20:50 -0400, Jim C. Brown wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 11:46:00PM +0200, Leonard paniq Ritter wrote: > > as most of you might already be aware, qemu 0.7.2 doesnt compile with > > gcc 4. > > > > is there a patch available? > Yes, but I caution you before using it. You shouldn't use the patch unless you > know what you are doing, and why you have to do it. > > Also keep in mind that even with the patch, qemu doesn't always compile. > x86 guests on x86 hosts don't work because of another bug that causes > gcc to run out of registers, so it still won't compile. x86 guests on > x86_64 hosts (e.g. amd64 cpus running in 64bit mode) do work, though, and > I'd imagine that x86 guests on ppc hosts work as well. > -- -- leonard "paniq" ritter -- http://www.mjoo.org -- http://www.paniq.org