From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F0ucm-0007f2-Am for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 00:52:20 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F0uci-0007VU-PZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 00:52:20 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F0uca-0007V5-MQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 00:52:10 -0500 Received: from [217.24.0.78] (helo=legolas.otaku42.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1F0uhH-00089n-3C for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 00:56:59 -0500 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Set SO_REUSEADDR at the right time From: Michael Renzmann In-Reply-To: <1137972761.17341.17.camel@aragorn> References: <1137972761.17341.17.camel@aragorn> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 06:49:20 +0100 Message-Id: <1137995360.4455.9.camel@gimli> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: mrenzmann@otaku42.de, qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: jhoger@pobox.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi. On Sun, 2006-01-22 at 15:32 -0800, John R. Hogerhuis wrote: > FYI, Fabrice has a hard enough time tracking patches. That sounds familiar. We (MadWifi, that is) had similar problems about half a year ago. Due to the preferences of the previous maintainer of this driver we did nearly everything by e-mail: patch submission, bug reports, feature requests, stuff like this. It was quite hard and very time consuming to follow all items and answer questions like "what is the current state of this bug", "is anyone working on integrating that patch" or "this patch has not yet been integrated, why?". Most of these problems have been solved by starting to use Trac [1]. It combines a wiki, a ticket engine, a webbased SVN repository browser and some other goodies. Works like a charm, freed up a lot of resources and help to improve the transparency of the project. We don't want to miss it anymore. Basically, I'd suggest to consider using some webbased software to manage things like bug reports, patches and feature requests. Trac might not fit the need of this project, but there are other tools around for similar tasks. My 0.02 Euro. Bye, Mike