From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76BEDC06510 for ; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 12:03:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EFBA21721 for ; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 12:03:52 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4EFBA21721 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:52034 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hiHVn-0001g0-Ik for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2019 08:03:51 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38053) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hiHSi-0008Cf-1v for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2019 08:00:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hiHSf-0004eU-Sh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2019 08:00:39 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46002) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hiHSV-0004E3-Sh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2019 08:00:29 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2D0A307D942; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 12:00:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A11401001E88; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 12:00:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zmail21.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (zmail21.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.83.24]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D5BB19736; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 12:00:24 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2019 08:00:24 -0400 (EDT) From: Pankaj Gupta To: Cornelia Huck Message-ID: <114089006.38605496.1562068824302.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20190702135519.46a9e3f2.cohuck@redhat.com> References: <20190619094907.10131-1-pagupta@redhat.com> <20190619094907.10131-5-pagupta@redhat.com> <20190702135519.46a9e3f2.cohuck@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.67.117.88, 10.4.195.2] Thread-Topic: virtio-pci: Proxy for virtio-pmem Thread-Index: g8kQadFRJ3b3IHtMXUnr6oQ72uewCA== X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.48]); Tue, 02 Jul 2019 12:00:24 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/7] virtio-pci: Proxy for virtio-pmem X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, aarcange@redhat.com, xiaoguangrong eric , mst@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, riel@surriel.com, david@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, ehabkost@redhat.com, lcapitulino@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, imammedo@redhat.com, dan j williams , nilal@redhat.com, dgilbert@redhat.com, rth@twiddle.net Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" > > On Wed, 19 Jun 2019 15:19:04 +0530 > Pankaj Gupta wrote: > > > We need a proxy device for virtio-pmem, and this device has to be the > > actual memory device so we can cleanly hotplug it. > > > > Forward memory device class functions either to the actual device or use > > properties of the virtio-pmem device to implement these in the proxy. > > > > virtio-pmem will only be compiled for selected, supported architectures > > (that can deal with virtio/pci devices being memory devices). An > > architecture that is prepared for that can simply enable > > CONFIG_VIRTIO_PMEM to make it work. > > > > As not all architectures support memory devices (and CONFIG_VIRTIO_PMEM > > will be enabled per supported architecture), we have to move the PCI proxy > > to a separate file. > > > > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta > > [ split up patches, memory-device changes, move pci proxy] > > Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand > > --- > > hw/virtio/Makefile.objs | 1 + > > hw/virtio/virtio-pmem-pci.c | 131 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > hw/virtio/virtio-pmem-pci.h | 34 ++++++++++++ > > include/hw/pci/pci.h | 1 + > > 4 files changed, 167 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 hw/virtio/virtio-pmem-pci.c > > create mode 100644 hw/virtio/virtio-pmem-pci.h > > (...) > > > +static const VirtioPCIDeviceTypeInfo virtio_pmem_pci_info = { > > + .base_name = TYPE_VIRTIO_PMEM_PCI, > > + .generic_name = "virtio-pmem-pci", > > + .transitional_name = "virtio-pmem-pci-transitional", > > Do we even have a transitional device for this? I.e., do we have a > legacy version? I don't think that makes sense for new devices. No. Sure, will remove this. Thank you, Pankaj > > > + .non_transitional_name = "virtio-pmem-pci-non-transitional", > > + .instance_size = sizeof(VirtIOPMEMPCI), > > + .instance_init = virtio_pmem_pci_instance_init, > > + .class_init = virtio_pmem_pci_class_init, > > + .interfaces = (InterfaceInfo[]) { > > + { TYPE_MEMORY_DEVICE }, > > + { } > > + }, > > +}; > > (...) >