From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FPm8P-0007TX-LM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2006 14:51:45 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FPm8P-0007Sy-6Y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2006 14:51:45 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FPm8O-0007Sv-T7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2006 14:51:44 -0500 Received: from [80.248.178.172] (helo=mail.aidworld.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1FPmB4-0000M3-QI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2006 14:54:31 -0500 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Missing ARMv6 instructions? From: Chris Wilson In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2006 19:51:03 +0000 Message-Id: <1143921063.6857.79.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Paul Brook Hi all, On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 18:00 +0200, Wolfgang Schildbach wrote: > I find it strange that ARM would restrict emulation of their architecture > -- that could hardly pose a threat to their business, I would say. Unfortunately, I don't. ARM probably makes quite a lot of money from their development tools (compilers, debuggers, simulators) as well as actual chips, and they have been an extensive user of software patents, even in the EU where they are probably not valid. How about we target OpenCores instead of ARM? Cheers, Chris. -- ___ __ _ / __/ / ,__(_)_ | Chris Wilson <0000 at qwirx.com> - Cambs UK | / (_/ ,\/ _/ /_ \ | Security/C/C++/Java/Perl/SQL/HTML Developer | \ _/_/_/_//_/___/ | We are GNU-free your mind-and your software |