From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44692) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZlfbD-0003HY-UG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 12:05:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZlfbA-0005Yl-IL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 12:05:19 -0400 Received: from mx6-phx2.redhat.com ([209.132.183.39]:43671) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZlfbA-0005YP-Bh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 12:05:16 -0400 Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 12:05:08 -0400 (EDT) From: =?utf-8?Q?Marc-Andr=C3=A9?= Lureau Message-ID: <1148374065.29038720.1444665908658.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1444662732-31557-1-git-send-email-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] config: enable ivshmem on POSIX List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Marc-Andr=C3=A9?= Lureau , David Gibson , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , QEMU Developers , Paolo Bonzini Hi Peter ----- Original Message ----- > On 12 October 2015 at 16:12, wrote: > > From: Marc-Andr=C3=A9 Lureau > > > > ivshmem doesn't actually require kvm, so enable it when POSIX is > > enabled. (it is required however when ioeventfd is enabled) > > > > Signed-off-by: Marc-Andr=C3=A9 Lureau > > --- > > default-configs/pci.mak | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/default-configs/pci.mak b/default-configs/pci.mak > > index 7e10903..f250119 100644 > > --- a/default-configs/pci.mak > > +++ b/default-configs/pci.mak > > @@ -35,5 +35,5 @@ CONFIG_SDHCI=3Dy > > CONFIG_EDU=3Dy > > CONFIG_VGA=3Dy > > CONFIG_VGA_PCI=3Dy > > -CONFIG_IVSHMEM=3D$(CONFIG_KVM) > > +CONFIG_IVSHMEM=3D$(CONFIG_POSIX) > > CONFIG_ROCKER=3Dy >=20 > I did a quick test of an OSX build with this change and > you'll be pleased to know it builds ok, no new compile > warnings :-) Yes indeed, thanks for checking! Can I add tested-by or do you add your signed off?