From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G6x7D-0003hK-0E
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 29 Jul 2006 18:16:59 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G6x7A-0003h8-KH
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 29 Jul 2006 18:16:57 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G6x7A-0003h5-Dn
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 29 Jul 2006 18:16:56 -0400
Received: from [65.24.5.136] (helo=ms-smtp-02.ohiordc.rr.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G6x9T-0000wH-7j
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 29 Jul 2006 18:19:19 -0400
Received: from r51.oakcourt.dyndns.org (cpe-65-24-47-209.columbus.res.rr.com
	[65.24.47.209])
	by ms-smtp-02.ohiordc.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id
	k6TMGrob008771
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sat, 29 Jul 2006 18:16:54 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Accelerator feature
From: Andrew Barr <andrew.james.barr@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <db7b3ca90607291456i136806d9k86f680e142afbf5b@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20060729180513.24200.qmail@web27510.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
	<Pine.LNX.4.63.0607292009230.3989@silence.gardas.net>
	<db7b3ca90607291456i136806d9k86f680e142afbf5b@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 18:16:51 -0400
Message-Id: <1154211411.7021.3.camel@r51.oakcourt.dyndns.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Sat, 2006-07-29 at 14:56 -0700, Jonathan Kalbfeld wrote:
> To be honest, I'd be willing to PAY Fabrice for QEMU.
> 
> What else can I use to boot windows 2k on my sun blade 2000 at work?
> 
> jonathan

I have never seen anyone say why KQEMU is closed, though, at least
beyond any speculation. And I've searched the mailing list archives at
Gmane, reading the long thread from when KQEMU was new and the various
threads since then.

I certainly respect that as the author of the code Fabrice has made that
choice, but I'd just be interested to know why.

QVM86 was a viable alternative in my mind, at least until KQEMU got
kernel-mode virtualization. Oh, well.

Andrew