From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34254) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZfhOh-0002uz-Lj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 26 Sep 2015 00:47:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZfhOe-00049D-FI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 26 Sep 2015 00:47:43 -0400 Received: from mx3-phx2.redhat.com ([209.132.183.24]:41567) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZfhOe-00048I-7d for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 26 Sep 2015 00:47:40 -0400 Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2015 00:47:34 -0400 (EDT) From: Prasanna Kalever Message-ID: <1159167986.22189489.1443242854311.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20150923150455.GL324088@andariel.pipo.sk> References: <1442834654-28198-1-git-send-email-prasanna.kalever@redhat.com> <56002543.9040908@redhat.com> <931442464.19730275.1442909214144.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <20150923150455.GL324088@andariel.pipo.sk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/1] block/gluster: add support for multiple gluster backup volfile servers List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Krempa Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, stefanha@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, deepakcs@redhat.com, bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com, rtalur@redhat.com > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 04:06:54 -0400, Prasanna Kalever wrote: > > > > > On 09/21/2015 05:24 AM, Prasanna Kumar Kalever wrote: > > > > This patch adds a way to specify multiple backup volfile servers to the > > > > gluster > > > > block backend of QEMU with tcp|rdma transport types and their port > > > > numbers. > > > > > > > > ter > ... > > > > > > > +## > > > > +{ 'struct': 'BlockdevOptionsGluster', > > > > + 'data': { 'volname': 'str', > > > > + 'image-path': 'str', > > > > + 'backup-volfile-servers': [ 'GlusterTuplePattern' ] } } > > > > > > Shouldn't this be simply 'volfile-servers', as you are including the > > > primary server in addition to the backup servers? > > > > > > > Again I want to maintain naming as mount.glusterfs do for fuse. > > Well, I have to agree with Eric here. I think the option name doesn't > need to be kept in sync with the gluster implementation since they don't > share anything with qemu and since the array contains also the primary > server to be queried the word backup doesn't make snese there. Yes Peter, I have to agree with you and Eric. I will rectify this changes in next patch-set, just waiting for 'gfapi' patch to get merged. Thank you, Best Regards, Prasanna Kumar Kalever. > > Peter >