From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GUUWR-00014E-7b
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 16:36:19 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GUUWO-00013O-La
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 16:36:18 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GUUWO-00013K-Ig
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 16:36:16 -0400
Received: from [65.24.5.137] (helo=ms-smtp-03.ohiordc.rr.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GUUcR-0001G6-VP
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 16:42:32 -0400
Received: from conroe (cpe-65-24-47-209.columbus.res.rr.com [65.24.47.209])
	by ms-smtp-03.ohiordc.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id
	k92KaE1h024198
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 16:36:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from andrew by conroe with local (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <andrew.james.barr@gmail.com>) id 1GUUWL-0005U5-R4
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 16:36:13 -0400
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Brad Cambell's -no-reboot patch.
From: Andrew Barr <andrew.james.barr@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.4.64.0610021321150.27357@luke.xen.prgmr.com>
References: <Pine.NEB.4.64.0610021321150.27357@luke.xen.prgmr.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 16:36:13 -0400
Message-Id: <1159821373.20980.1.camel@conroe>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 13:21 -0700, Luke Crawford wrote:
> what needs to happen to get this patch committed?  

I think it was just committed to CVS if I'm not mistaken.