From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GuRPM-0005na-BB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 05:32:16 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GuRPK-0005mh-JI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 05:32:14 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GuRPK-0005mR-13 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 05:32:14 -0500 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1GuRPI-0002Dc-T0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 05:32:13 -0500 Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1GuRNC-0000L4-Ir for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:30:03 +0100 Received: from althur.gotadsl.co.uk ([84.12.135.175]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:30:02 +0100 Received: from ross by althur.gotadsl.co.uk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:30:02 +0100 From: Ross Burton Message-ID: <1166005383.21696.9.camel@blackadder> References: <10541fa50612130009s798a1587n4a3d2b8b51baa334@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <10541fa50612130009s798a1587n4a3d2b8b51baa334@mail.gmail.com> Sender: news Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: About performance of qemu-system-arm Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:32:16 -0000 To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 16:09 +0800, PianoPan wrote: > Now, I'm planning to use Qemu as our mobile device emulator (ARM). > Before our development, I want to confirm performance of it. I use > packages from http://folks.o-hand.com/richard/qemu.html to build the > evaluation environment, but performance of Linux in Qemu is too slow. > It uses about one hour to boot GUI system. > > Can anybody tell me this performance is proper or not? On my laptop -- a Intel Core Duo 1.8GHz -- I can boot an OpenEmbedded image (with X, matchbox, udev, etc) in a minute or so. Ross -- Ross Burton mail: ross@burtonini.com jabber: ross@burtonini.com www: http://www.burtonini.com./ PGP Fingerprint: 1A21 F5B0 D8D0 CFE3 81D4 E25A 2D09 E447 D0B4 33DF