From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GuXxi-0000zR-JA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:32:10 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GuXxh-0000yJ-Jn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:32:09 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GuXxh-0000xn-2p for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:32:09 -0500 Received: from [213.146.154.40] (helo=pentafluge.infradead.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1GuXxf-0002fl-VQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:32:08 -0500 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH]ish NPTL support. From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <200612131722.17889.paul@codesourcery.com> References: <1165703896.5253.472.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <200612132302.28204.a_mulyadi@softhome.net> <1166029294.5253.736.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <200612131722.17889.paul@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:32:03 +0000 Message-Id: <1166031123.5253.745.camel@pmac.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paul Brook Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 17:22 +0000, Paul Brook wrote: > I've a nasty feeling you're going to break the host libc if you do threading > this way. One possibly solution is to use the pthreads API instead, and map > everything onto that. Qemu doesn't use the host's threading support, does it? -- dwmw2