From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GvL3a-0007YY-SN
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:57:30 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GvL3Y-0007XJ-IN
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:57:29 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GvL3Y-0007XG-EO
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:57:28 -0500
Received: from [24.93.47.42] (helo=ms-smtp-03.texas.rr.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GvL3Y-000777-FQ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:57:28 -0500
Received: from vaio (cpe-66-68-31-100.austin.res.rr.com [66.68.31.100])
	by ms-smtp-03.texas.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBFLvQdh005260
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:57:26 -0600 (CST)
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Qemu speed vs vmplayer?
From: Lonnie Mendez <lmendez19@austin.rr.com>
In-Reply-To: <46d6db660612151348w542e05daq75e5c1eab6539cb6@mail.gmail.com>
References: <10541fa50612130009s798a1587n4a3d2b8b51baa334@mail.gmail.com>
	<200612151613.35422.paul@codesourcery.com>
	<45831FB1.4030907@tidetamerboatlifts.com>
	<200612152138.58994.paul@codesourcery.com>
	<46d6db660612151348w542e05daq75e5c1eab6539cb6@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:57:08 -0600
Message-Id: <1166219828.22784.14.camel@vaio>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Fri, 2006-12-15 at 22:48 +0100, Christian MICHON wrote:
> Using kqemu, I see no improvement in calculations, meaning the
> graphical part (sdl) is not the main blocking point. Next on my
> list of trials is the disk/io (we did some pthread experiment in the
> past, I think we can get some more bandwith here).

   Disk I/O on Linux and Freebsd hosts should be improved as qemu uses
AIO.  The Windows build has stubs for the async routines.