From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H9ODV-0006nB-9W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 11:09:49 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H9ODT-0006mM-GY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 11:09:48 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H9ODT-0006mI-8v for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 11:09:47 -0500 Received: from [24.93.47.44] (helo=ms-smtp-05.texas.rr.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1H9ODS-00006l-Ii for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 11:09:46 -0500 Received: from vaio (cpe-66-68-31-100.austin.res.rr.com [66.68.31.100]) by ms-smtp-05.texas.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0NG9UV6027599 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:09:30 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] fix i386-softmmu with newer kernel headers From: Lonnie Mendez In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:09:24 -0600 Message-Id: <1169568565.22155.0.camel@vaio> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 17:03 +0100, VMiklos wrote: > hi > > with newer kernel-headers, i get the following compile error: > gcc-3.3 -Wall -O2 -g -fno-strict-aliasing -fomit-frame-pointer -I. > -I.. -I/var/tmp/fst/src/qemu-0.8.2/target-i386 > -I/var/tmp/fst/src/qemu-0.8.2 -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 > -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -I/var/tmp/fst/src/qemu-0.8.2/fpu -DHAS_AUDIO > -I/var/tmp/fst/src/qemu-0.8.2/slirp -c -o usb-linux.o > /var/tmp/fst/src/qemu-0.8.2/usb-linux.c > /var/tmp/fst/src/qemu-0.8.2/usb-linux.c:29:28: linux/compiler.h: No > such file or directory > make[1]: *** [usb-linux.o] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/fst/src/qemu-0.8.2/i386-softmmu' > make: *** [subdir-i386-softmmu] Error 2 > > is this a known issue? > > a trivial patch is here: remove the #include statement in usb-linux.c. Compile. Done.