From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Jianjun Duan <duanj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, quintela@redhat.com,
mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org,
amit shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>,
david@gibson.dropbear.id.au
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [QEMU RFC PATCH v2 4/6] Migration: migrate QTAILQ
Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 13:51:55 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1171824705.17235966.1464198715349.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5745D4E7.2000003@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >> + /*
> >> + * Following 3 fields are for VMStateField which needs customized
> >> handling,
> >> + * such as QTAILQ in qemu/queue.h, lists, and tree.
> >> + */
> >> + const void *meta_data;
> >> + int (*extend_get)(QEMUFile *f, const void *metadata, void *opaque);
> >> + void (*extend_put)(QEMUFile *f, const void *metadata, void *opaque,
> >> + QJSON *vmdesc);
> >> } VMStateField;
> >
> > Do not add these two function pointers to VMStateField, instead add
> > QJSON* and VMStateField* arguments as needed to VMStateInfo's get and put.
>
> That is definitely the ideal way. However, VMStateInfo's get/put are
> already used extensively. If I change them, I need change all the
> calling sites of them. Not very sure about whether it will be welcomed.
Sure, don't be worried. :) True, there are quite a few VMStateInfos (about
35) but the changes are simple.
> >> +#define VMSTATE_QTAILQ_METADATA(_field, _state, _type, _next, _vmsd) { \
> >> + .first = QTAILQ_FIRST_OFFSET(typeof_field(_state, _field)), \
> >> + .last = QTAILQ_LAST_OFFSET(typeof_field(_state, _field)), \
> >> + .next = QTAILQ_NEXT_OFFSET(_type, _next), \
> >> + .prev = QTAILQ_PREV_OFFSET(_type, _next), \
> >> + .entry = offsetof(_type, _next), \
> >> + .size = sizeof(_type), \
> >> + .vmsd = &(_vmsd), \
> >> +}
> >
> > .last and .prev are unnecessary, since they come just after .first and
> > .next (and their use is hidden behind QTAILQ_RAW_*). .first and .next
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Actually, .first and .next are always 0. I misread your changes to qemu/queue.h.
See below.
> > can be placed in .offset and .num_offset respectively. So you don't
> > really need an extra metadata struct.
> >
> > If you prefer you could have something like
> >
> > union {
> > size_t num_offset; /* VMS_VARRAY */
> > size_t size_offset; /* VMS_VBUFFER */
> > size_t next_offset; /* VMS_TAILQ */
> > } offsets;
>
> Actually I explored the approach in which I use a VMSD to encode all the
> information. But a VMSD describes actual memory layout. Interpreting it
> another way could be confusing.
>
> One of the assumption about QTAILQ is that we can only use the
> interfaces defined in queue.h to access it. I intend not to depend on
> its actually layout. From this perspective, these 6 parameters are
> needed.
You are already adding QTAILQ_RAW_*, aren't you? Those interfaces
would need to know about the layout, and you are passing redundant
information:
- .next_offset should always be 0
- .prev_offset should always be sizeof(void *)
- .first_offset should always be 0
- .last_offset should always be sizeof(void *)
so you only need head and entry, which you can store in .offset and
.num_offset. The .vmsd field you have in ->metadata can be stored
in VMStateField's .vmsd, and likewise for .size (which can be stored
in VMStateField's .vmsd).
Thanks,
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-25 17:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-24 17:55 [Qemu-devel] [QEMU RFC PATCH v2 0/6] Migration: ensure hotplug and migration work together Jianjun Duan
2016-05-24 17:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [QEMU RFC PATCH v2 1/6] spapr: ensure device trees are always associated with DRC Jianjun Duan
2016-05-25 5:20 ` David Gibson
2016-05-24 17:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [QEMU RFC PATCH v2 2/6] Migration: Defined VMStateDescription struct for spapr_drc Jianjun Duan
2016-05-24 17:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [QEMU RFC PATCH v2 3/6] vmstate: Define VARRAY with VMS_ALLOC Jianjun Duan
2016-05-24 17:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [QEMU RFC PATCH v2 4/6] Migration: migrate QTAILQ Jianjun Duan
2016-05-25 5:38 ` David Gibson
2016-05-25 8:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-05-25 16:37 ` Jianjun Duan
2016-05-25 17:51 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2016-05-25 18:30 ` Jianjun Duan
2016-05-25 19:22 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-05-25 20:17 ` Jianjun Duan
2016-05-26 7:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-05-26 16:43 ` Jianjun Duan
2016-05-26 16:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-05-24 17:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [QEMU RFC PATCH v2 5/6] Migration: migrate ccs_list in spapr state Jianjun Duan
2016-05-24 17:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [QEMU RFC PATCH v2 6/6] Migration: migrate pending_events of " Jianjun Duan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1171824705.17235966.1464198715349.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=duanj@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).