From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IZsfK-0008H6-8Z
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:28:18 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IZsfI-0008FF-DJ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:28:17 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IZsfI-0008F8-5M
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:28:16 -0400
Received: from bangui.magic.fr ([195.154.194.245])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <l_indien@magic.fr>) id 1IZsfG-0005ev-Fu
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:28:15 -0400
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Updated RFC: linux user problems]]
From: Jocelyn Mayer <l_indien@magic.fr>
In-Reply-To: <20070924121929.GA27468@networkno.de>
References: <1190356760.14938.409.camel@rapid>
	<20070924121929.GA27468@networkno.de>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:27:54 +0200
Message-Id: <1190658474.28991.35.camel@jma4.dev.netgem.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: l_indien@magic.fr, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 13:19 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> J. Mayer wrote:
> [snip]
> > > > > May someone take a look at my patch and say if it seems reasonable to
> > > > > include this in the repository ?
> > > > 
> > > > Looks reasonable, but introduces new compiler warnings
> > > > (on a ppc32/Linux host):
> > 
> > The reported warnings have been fixed.
> > There are still a lot of warnings related to 32/64 bits invalid casts on
> > 64 bits hosts (see above) which will need to be fixed once.
> > 
> > I also changed some parameters of do_ipc from long to int (instead of
> > target_long), following the do_ipc man page specification, and reported
> > this change in child functions. There may be more to do...
> > 
> > Please comment...
> 
> Fine with me, FWIW.

Great. I may do another pass, to check all helpers against long/int
confusion to avoid using target_ulong when not necessary.
I would appreciate anyone who would test the patch on other platforms
than x86 / PowerPC, as I would like not to break everything...