* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] getpriority() shouldn't use libc wrapper
@ 2007-09-26 20:06 Thayne Harbaugh
2007-10-02 5:30 ` Thayne Harbaugh
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Thayne Harbaugh @ 2007-09-26 20:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 216 bytes --]
The linux-user getpriority() syscall goes through the libc wrapper.
This causes a problem because the libc wrapper remaps the return value
from the kernel. This patch calls the kernel getpriority syscall
directly.
[-- Attachment #2: 47_getpriority.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1394 bytes --]
Index: qemu/linux-user/syscall.c
===================================================================
--- qemu.orig/linux-user/syscall.c 2007-09-26 13:13:40.000000000 -0600
+++ qemu/linux-user/syscall.c 2007-09-26 14:10:29.000000000 -0600
@@ -174,6 +174,7 @@
#define __NR_sys_getcwd1 __NR_getcwd
#define __NR_sys_getdents __NR_getdents
#define __NR_sys_getdents64 __NR_getdents64
+#define __NR_sys_getpriority __NR_getpriority
#define __NR_sys_linkat __NR_linkat
#define __NR_sys_mkdirat __NR_mkdirat
#define __NR_sys_mknodat __NR_mknodat
@@ -229,6 +230,7 @@
#if defined(TARGET_NR_getdents64) && defined(__NR_getdents64)
_syscall3(int, sys_getdents64, uint, fd, struct dirent64 *, dirp, uint, count);
#endif
+_syscall2(int, sys_getpriority, int, which, int, who);
_syscall5(int, _llseek, uint, fd, ulong, hi, ulong, lo,
loff_t *, res, uint, wh);
#if defined(TARGET_NR_linkat) && defined(__NR_linkat)
@@ -4010,7 +4012,10 @@
break;
#endif
case TARGET_NR_getpriority:
- ret = get_errno(getpriority(arg1, arg2));
+ /* libc does special remapping of the return value of
+ * sys_getpriority() so it's just easiest to call
+ * sys_getpriority() directly rather than through libc. */
+ ret = sys_getpriority(arg1, arg2);
break;
case TARGET_NR_setpriority:
ret = get_errno(setpriority(arg1, arg2, arg3));
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] getpriority() shouldn't use libc wrapper
2007-09-26 20:06 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] getpriority() shouldn't use libc wrapper Thayne Harbaugh
@ 2007-10-02 5:30 ` Thayne Harbaugh
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Thayne Harbaugh @ 2007-10-02 5:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 14:06 -0600, Thayne Harbaugh wrote:
> The linux-user getpriority() syscall goes through the libc wrapper.
> This causes a problem because the libc wrapper remaps the return value
> from the kernel. This patch calls the kernel getpriority syscall
> directly.
I didn't see any discussion about this nor did I see it committed. Were
there any concerns or objections? It fixes several failures in the LTP
test suite.
The bug is that the kernel returns -1 on error and 1-40 on success - the
libc wrapper remaps this to -1 or error and -20 - 19 on succes (errno
must be cleared and checked for the -1 case to determine if there was an
error). If qemu uses the libc wrapper then the return value is aleady
remapped to negative numbers - which appear to be errors.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-10-02 5:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-09-26 20:06 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] getpriority() shouldn't use libc wrapper Thayne Harbaugh
2007-10-02 5:30 ` Thayne Harbaugh
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).