From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ig6WA-0003ms-Qf
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 18:28:35 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ig6W8-0003j8-2P
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 18:28:34 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ig6W7-0003iw-Qw
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 18:28:31 -0400
Received: from honiara.magic.fr ([195.154.193.36])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <l_indien@magic.fr>) id 1Ig6W7-0005oj-7h
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 18:28:31 -0400
Received: from [192.168.0.2] (ppp-36.net-123.static.magiconline.fr
	[80.118.184.36])
	by honiara.magic.fr (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l9BMSR0f010692
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 00:28:27 +0200
Subject: [Fwd: [Qemu-devel] RFC: avoid #ifdef for target cpu list]
From: "J. Mayer" <l_indien@magic.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 00:28:28 +0200
Message-Id: <1192141709.9976.241.camel@rapid>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

-------- Forwarded Message --------
> From: J. Mayer <l_indien@magic.fr>
> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Subject: [Qemu-devel] RFC: avoid #ifdef for target cpu list
> Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 07:14:22 +0200
> 
> This tiny patch unifies the -cpu ? option for all cpu that actually can
> handle it.
> It changes the arm_cpu_list to use the same prototype as ppc, mips and
> sparc and add a new define cpu_list in target_xxx/cpu.h
> As the cpu selection is not implemented for all targets, I had to
> protect the call to cpu_list with a #if defined(cpu_list) that will have
> to be suppressed once all target will implement this feature.
> 
> Please comment.

If there is no objection about it, I'll apply it today.

-- 
J. Mayer <l_indien@magic.fr>
Never organized