From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Igdjo-0000wA-Ud for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 05:56:52 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Igdjk-0000sZ-8D for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 05:56:52 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Igdjj-0000sH-UU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 05:56:47 -0400 Received: from honiara.magic.fr ([195.154.193.36]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Igdji-0003GP-Gv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 05:56:47 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.2] (ppp-36.net-123.static.magiconline.fr [80.118.184.36]) by honiara.magic.fr (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l9D9uPAs026428 for ; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 11:56:26 +0200 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC: avoid #ifdef for target cpu list - for x86, too. From: "J. Mayer" In-Reply-To: <20071012085431.GA13221@karma.qumranet.com> References: <1192141709.9976.241.camel@rapid> <20071012085431.GA13221@karma.qumranet.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 11:56:27 +0200 Message-Id: <1192269387.9976.307.camel@rapid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 10:54 +0200, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: > This seems like a good excuse to send my suggested -cpu option for the > x86 target. It is just like my previous "take 4", but fits to the newly > unified cpu_list. I don't know x86 so well to comment the x86 CPU definitions, but having this option for x86 too is welcome... [...] -- J. Mayer Never organized