From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J21L2-0002jk-Hu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 04:23:40 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J21Ky-0002dU-OT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 04:23:40 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J21Ky-0002dG-K8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 04:23:36 -0500 Received: from ecfrec.frec.bull.fr ([129.183.4.8]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J21Ky-0001le-08 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 04:23:36 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ecfrec.frec.bull.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78BF719D959 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:23:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from ecfrec.frec.bull.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ecfrec.frec.bull.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28541-08 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:23:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from ecn002.frec.bull.fr (ecn002.frec.bull.fr [129.183.4.6]) by ecfrec.frec.bull.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0911A19D99B for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:23:20 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] QEMU Dbus support - a proposal management API From: Laurent Vivier In-Reply-To: <475E5403.2000705@bellard.org> References: <475E5403.2000705@bellard.org> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:23:17 +0100 Message-Id: <1197364997.4242.10.camel@frecb07144> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-FcuVaJVmhF+0W+77zmsK" Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org --=-FcuVaJVmhF+0W+77zmsK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le mardi 11 d=C3=A9cembre 2007 =C3=A0 10:10 +0100, Fabrice Bellard a =C3=A9= crit : > Hi, Hi, > At this point I am not interested in integrating it into QEMU as it is=20 > one more API level to maintain in addition to the command line monitor.=20 > However, I can change my mind if several projects insists to have a=20 > similar interface. perhaps the DBUS interface can replace the command line monitor ? We have just to move the command line interface to a client speaking to qemu through the DBUS interface. I guess Yuval will be very happy to make this work :-D Regards, laurent --=20 ------------- Laurent.Vivier@bull.net -------------- "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." - Arthur C. Clarke --=-FcuVaJVmhF+0W+77zmsK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBHXlcF9Kffa9pFVzwRAr86AJ90GMrVLFNpFqegjA+RABrXgtc4awCcCDci Bf0xXzytylzJ+nBKBWSJ7lg= =Oirq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-FcuVaJVmhF+0W+77zmsK--