From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37611) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fYd9g-0006dI-HN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 16:04:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fYd9d-0006tr-Dy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 16:04:36 -0400 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:51918 helo=mx1.redhat.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fYd9d-0006se-9W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 16:04:33 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45B9B406AE3F for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 20:04:32 +0000 (UTC) References: <20180607101019.14958-1-berrange@redhat.com> <20180628131722.GA13766@redhat.com> <8964dea3-042d-2eac-0198-d50c9c8947fc@redhat.com> <03c1e60e-6f5b-51cb-afe1-9f4e26a2c56b@redhat.com> <20180628162941.GT3513@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <11e8e519-e378-02f4-a88d-329e16915432@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 22:04:30 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180628162941.GT3513@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] doc: switch to modern syntx for VNC TLS setup List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "=?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_P._Berrang=c3=a9?=" Cc: Eric Blake , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 28/06/2018 18:29, Daniel P. Berrang=C3=A9 wrote: > Yeah, in this case I'd rather stick with single dash, for consistency, > since this example is not applicable to non-system emulators anyway. >=20 >> I honestly don't understand the crusade against single-dashed options. > It does cause confusion in some documentation contexts with -object, > since qemu-nbd/qemu-img/qemu-io all mandated --object instead. It's okay if you're documenting --object. But I think consistency should win when you are showing examples for QEMU; then all options should use either single or double dashes. Paolo