From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JU63N-0006DV-7N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:05:29 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JU63G-0006AE-Vf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:05:27 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JU63G-00069w-Kh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:05:22 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JU63G-0001Ci-8U for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:05:22 -0500 From: Glauber Costa Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:56:30 -0300 Message-Id: <1204055805-32349-1-git-send-email-gcosta@redhat.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/15] acpi processor hotplug Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: marcelo@kvack.org, glommer@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, chrisw@sous-sol.org Hi, I'm resending the series with avi's few comments merged, and a couple of others on my own: * _STA returns 0xF instead of 0x1. According to the specification, it means that the device, besides present, is also functional, enabled, and a couple of other cool things. * gpe_base and proc_base as #defines, not unsigned long * _EJ method out. It's causing a lot of troubles, and I'm not even sure it makes sense for processors. We can live without it by now, and if it is needed, it can be added later. Have a safe trip back home,